What is the Potential Impact of Reviewing Post-procedure Images With Patients Following Interventional Spine Procedures.
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Enrollment
- 141
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Modified Press Gainey Satisfaction (PGS) Questionnaire
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of spine physicians reviewing post-procedural fluoroscopic images with patients. The outcome measure to be assessed will be the potential impact the patient satisfaction and the patient's global impression of change (PGIC) 2 weeks after the spine procedure.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Non Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Sequential
- Primary Purpose
- Supportive Care
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Lumbosacral radiculopathy symptoms
- •Received transforaminal epidural steroid injection
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients who will be sedated for transforaminal epidural steroid injection
- •Unable to read or understand English-language survey
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Modified Press Gainey Satisfaction (PGS) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 2 hours following procedure in the post-op area
Patient satisfaction as measured by a modified version of the PGS Questionnaire. The questionnaire is comprised of 9 questions measuring general patient satisfaction with the care experience. Each question is on a scale of 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). The lowest possible score of the PGS is 9, and the highest possible score is 45. The lower the total score, the poorer the patient's satisfaction, while the higher the score, the higher the patient's satisfaction.
Secondary Outcomes
- Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)(2 weeks following procedure)
Investigators
David Kohns
Principal Investigator
University of Michigan