Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00650260
NCT00650260CompletedNot Applicable

Intraoperative Warming : Comparison of Performance of the Dynatherm Medical vitalHEAT™ Temperature Management System (vH2) and the Arizant Bair Hugger System

University of South Florida2 sites in 1 country42 target enrollmentStarted: February 2009Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
42
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Percent of Patients With an Average Intraoperative Temperature Greater Than or Equal to 36 Celcius

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Hypothermia is a common and serious complication during anesthesia and surgery. Anesthetic-induced hypothermia results from the inhibition of thermoregulatory control and exposure to cold operating room environment.

Various warming methods, such as warm blankets, forced-air warmers and circulating water mattresses, are currently used to prevent and treat mild perioperative hypothermia. All are cutaneous approaches that rely on heating the peripheral tissues in order to increase the thermal core temperature. Application of cutaneous warming system blankets/pads are limited by location/extent of operative site; for example, in certain procedures such as laparatomies, reconstructive plastic surgery or orthopedic surgery, only a limited amount of skin surface is available for warming application. The Dynatherm vitalHEAT technology takes advantage of the body's natural thermoregulatory system to channel thermal energy to the body's core non-invasively at a rapid rate. The vital heat (vH2) system is designed to treat hypothermia during the peri-operative period through a combination of localized heat and vacuum application to one hand & forearm; this application 1) opens the arteriovenous anastamoses located in the palm of the hand and 2) conductively warms the extremity thus effectively warming the blood flow to the body's core. The vital heat vH2 system is a portable and compact warming device which provides a non-invasive approach to warming patients during surgery.

The primary objective of this study is to determine if the Dynatherm Medical vitalHEAT (vH2) Temperature Management System is as effective as the forced-air warming Bair Hugger™ (Arizant Healthcare, Eden Prairie, MN) for maintenance of intraoperative body temperature in patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. The critical endpoints to be evaluated in making this determination are 1) % of subjects with an average intraoperative esophageal temperature of ≥ 36º C and 2) % of subjects with an initial post anesthesia care unit sublingual temperature of ≥ 36º C. Secondary objectives include 1) comparison of the core body temperatures @ 60 minutes post anesthesia induction, 2) comparison of temperature trends during surgery and 3) comparison of the subjects' post anesthesia care unit temperature trends and hypothermic symptoms such as shivering.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgical procedures with an expected duration of 2 to 4 hours and requiring general anesthesia
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status I-III
  • Patient age: > 18 years and <80 years

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient age: < 18 years and >80 years
  • Patients with break in skin integrity on the extremity selected as the application site
  • Patients with history of upper extremity peripheral vascular disease
  • Patients with history of allergic skin conditions of the upper extremities
  • Patients with history of bleeding disorders/coagulopathy
  • Patient with history of malignant hyperthermia
  • Patients who are pregnant
  • Patient unwilling or unable to give informed consent

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percent of Patients With an Average Intraoperative Temperature Greater Than or Equal to 36 Celcius

Time Frame: Intraoperative Period

Percentage of Patients With a Post Operative Sublingual Temperature Above 36 Degrees Celcius

Time Frame: Upon entry to the post anesthesia care unit

Percent of subjects with an initial post anesthesia care unit sublingual temperature of ≥ 36º C

Percent of Subjects With an Initial PACU Sublingual Temperature of ≥ 36º C.

Time Frame: Temp taken just prior to surgery

Secondary Outcomes

  • Comparison of the Core Body Temperatures at 60 Minutes Post Anesthesia Induction,as Assessed by Esophageal Probe.(60 minutes post anesthesia induction)
  • Median Post Anesthesia Care Unit Sublingual Temperature(Upon arrival to the post anesthesia care unit)
  • Average Intraoperative Esophageal Temperature(Intraoperative 0-70 minutes)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Enrico Camporesi

Emeritus Professor of Surgery / Anesthesiology

University of South Florida

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Intraoperative Warming Comparison of... | Clinical Trial