Articaine Versus Lidocaine Buccal Infiltration

Phase 2

Active, not recruiting

• Conditions: Pain
• Interventions: Drug: lidocaine local anethesia with vasoconstrictor; Drug: articaine local anethesia with vasoconstrictor

• Registration Number: NCT05223075
• Lead Sponsor: Fayoum University

Brief Summary

assess the effect of articaine versus lidocaine in only buccal infiltration of local anethesia in lower anterior teeth

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2022-01-23
• Study First Submitted QC: 2022-01-23
• Study First Posted: 2022-02-03
• Study Start: 2022-11-11
• Status Verified: 2023-02
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-02-14
• Last Update Posted: 2023-02-15
• Primary Completion: 2023-02-28
• Study Completion: 2023-03-02

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 31

Inclusion Criteria

• medically stable
• 18years or older
• patient with bilateral lower anterior teeth requiring non surgical removal

Exclusion Criteria

• grade 3 mobility
• neurological disease
• allergy to anethesia

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
lidocaine group	lidocaine local anethesia with vasoconstrictor	-
articaine group	articaine local anethesia with vasoconstrictor	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
pain during extraction	during extraction	by (VAS) visual analouge scale

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Fayoum University; 🇪🇬 Fayoum, Egypt