Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05340517
NCT05340517CompletedNot Applicable

Prospective Study of Video-assisted Rib Planting in Chest Wall Stabilization

Weigang Zhao1 site in 1 country20 target enrollmentStarted: February 22, 2021Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
20
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The pain score after operation

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the advantages and disadvantages of video-assisted rib planting and traditional internal fixation of rib fractures in chest wall stabilization.

The investigators design a new surgical method of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for rib fractures, evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the new surgical techniques with a prospective study.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •≥3 unilateral rib displacement fractures
  • •18-70 years old
  • •ASA score I-II
  • •Preoperative arterial oxygen partial pressure >60mmHg
  • •Carbon dioxide partial pressure <50mmHg

Exclusion Criteria

  • •The distance from the broken end of the posterior rib fracture to the spine is less than 2cm
  • •Airway stenosis
  • •Abnormal coagulation system
  • •History of peptic ulcer or bleeding
  • •History of allergy to anesthesia related drugs
  • •History of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema
  • •Pregnant women

Arms & Interventions

video-assisted rib planting

Experimental

Intervention: video-assisted rib planting (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The pain score after operation

Time Frame: 24 hours after operation

The investigators evaluate and record the patients' pain score after operation by visual analog scale (VAS). 0-10 is used to represent different degrees of pain, 0 is painless and 10 is severe pain. The grading criteria of pain were: 0: no pain; 1-3: mild pain; 4-6: moderate pain; 7-10: severe pain.

The pain score after operation

Time Frame: 6 hours after operation

The investigators evaluate and record the patients' pain score after operation by visual analog scale (VAS),which is used to evaluate pain scores 6h,12h,and 24h after the operation. 0-10 is used to represent different degrees of pain, 0 is painless and 10 is severe pain. The grading criteria of pain were: 0: no pain; 1-3: mild pain; 4-6: moderate pain; 7-10: severe pain.

The pain score after operation

Time Frame: 12 hours after operation

The investigators evaluate and record the patients' pain score after operation by visual analog scale (VAS). 0-10 is used to represent different degrees of pain, 0 is painless and 10 is severe pain. The grading criteria of pain were: 0: no pain; 1-3: mild pain; 4-6: moderate pain; 7-10: severe pain.

Secondary Outcomes

  • The postoperative drainage(7 days at most)

Investigators

Sponsor
Weigang Zhao
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Weigang Zhao

Clinical Professor

Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials