Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03537300
NCT03537300CompletedNot Applicable

Efficacy of Deep Cervical Flexor Muscles Training on Neck Pain, Functional Disability and Muscle Endurance in School Teachers

King Saud University0 sites65 target enrollmentStarted: May 21, 2016Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
65
Primary Endpoint
Change in Pain at day 42, day 14 after intervention from baseline

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Neck pain (NP) is a common work related disorder. Teaching is one profession in which its prevalence is high. The Daily job of a school teacher involves head down posture while reading, writing, etc., exposing them to risk of developing NP. Deep cervical flexor (DCF) muscles have been shown to have lower endurance in patients with cervical impairment which has been associated with disability. There is limited evidence that reports efficacy of DCF muscles training in occupational NP. This study was done to see the effect of DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback on pain, muscle endurance and functional disability in school teachers with NP.

Detailed Description

Neck pain (NP) is a common work related disorder. Teaching is one profession in which its prevalence is high. The Daily job of a school teacher involves head down posture while reading, writing, etc., exposing them to risk of developing NP. Deep cervical flexor (DCF) muscles have been shown to have lower endurance in patients with cervical impairment which has been associated with disability. There is limited evidence that reports efficacy of DCF muscles training in occupational NP. This study was done to see the effect of DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback on pain, muscle endurance and functional disability in school teachers with NP. 65 teachers, aged between 25 to 45 years with experience of more than 5 years were agreed to participate in this study. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups, experimental (EG) and control group (CG). In EG, subjects received DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional exercises for neck pain while in CG subjects received only conventional exercises. Pain, muscle endurance and disability measured at day 0 (before treatment), day 14 and day 42 after treatment. Endurance of DCF muscles was measured by CCF test using pressure biofeedback instrument, Pain intensity was measured using NPRS and Functional disability was assessed using NDI questionnaire.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
25 Years to 45 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •experience of more than 5 years
  • •neck pain score of more than 5 on numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), mild to moderate disability score on neck disability index (NDI) and poor cranio-cervical flexion (CCF) test

Exclusion Criteria

  • •any neurological sign or symptom, history of spinal surgery or if they were taking any treatment for their pain.

Arms & Interventions

control group

Active Comparator

Intervention: conventional exercises (Behavioral)

experimental group

Experimental

Intervention: DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional exercises (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Pain at day 42, day 14 after intervention from baseline

Time Frame: at day 0 (before treatment), day 14 and day 42 after treatment

Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS): NPRS. Subjects had to rate their pain on the 0-10 rating scale, where 0 means no pain while 10 is the worst possible pain.

Change in muscle endurance at day 42, day 14 after intervention from baseline

Time Frame: at day 0 (before treatment), day 14 and day 42 after treatment

Craniocervical flexion test (CCF) test using pressure biofeedback instrument

Secondary Outcomes

  • disability(at day 0 (before treatment), day 14 and day 42 after treatment)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Zaheen A. Iqbal

Principal investigator

King Saud University

Similar Trials