MedPath

Evaluation and Rehabilitation for Coordinated Control of Bilateral Ankle Joints in Stroke Patients

Not Applicable
Conditions
Stroke,Rehabilitation,Coordination,Ankle
Registration Number
NCT05026359
Lead Sponsor
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
Brief Summary

The coordinated control between the bilateral ankles plays an important role in daily life functions such as walking and balance. The central nervous system damage caused by stroke, in addition to the limitation of the ankle movement on the hemiplegic side and the deterioration of the movement ability, It will seriously affect the coordinated control performance between the bilateral ankle joints, which will cause the majority of stroke patients to have barriers to walking function, and increase the patient's daily care depending on the caregiver. However, there is currently no research on stroke patients, the development of a coordinated control evaluation method with bilateral ankle joints, the use of load-bearing state simulation similar to the real-life bilateral ankle and foot coordination control performance, the establishment of clinical value of bilateral ankle Coordinating the performance parameters of the control evaluation; thus, the clinical doctors can not accurately understand the degree of defect in the bilateral foot and ankle coordination control of the stroke patients, and explore the influence of the bilateral ankle-foot coordination control defect on the daily life function of the stroke patients, and even cannot be based on the evaluation results. The clinical parameters, combined with visual feedback and bilateral rehabilitation advantages of rehabilitation training program, improve the bilateral ankle joint coordination control ability and lower limb function of stroke patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to establish an assessment system that can be used to measure the performance of bilateral ankle joint coordination control, to understand the degree of injury in bilateral ankle and foot coordination control, and to analyze the biped coordination parameters and clinical gait performance. The characteristics, and then the design of a double-sided rehabilitation training program combined with visual feedback, is used to improve the bilateral ankle joint coordination control performance and lower limb movement function of stroke patients.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  1. at least 6 months since stroke
  2. three or fewer incidents of unilateral stroke confirmed by taking the participant's medical history
  3. ability to follow the researcher's instructions
  4. the ability to flex and extend the paretic lower limb and ankle
  5. Modified Ashworth Score (MAS) ≦3 for the ankle joints
  6. a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 24 or higher
  7. no other orthopedic or neurological disorders
  8. Brunnstrom stage 4
  9. no participation in other experimental rehabilitation or drug studies
Exclusion Criteria
  1. unstable cardiovascular conditions
  2. uncontrolled hypertension (190/110 mm Hg)
  3. severe orthopedic or pain conditions
  4. dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination score < 22)
  5. aphasia with inability to follow researcher's commands
  6. Visual dysfunction
  7. severe joint contracture of bilateral lower limb extremities that would impact the movement performance of the lower limb extremities

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Bilateral ankle coordination evaluationChange from Baseline at 4 weeks

The foot (affected foot) first moves to 10° plantar flexion, and the other foot moves to 10° dorsiflexion for 10 seconds; then one foot gradually moves from 10° plantar flexion to 10° dorsiflexion, and the other foot moves from dorsiflexion 10° °Move to 10° plantar flexion.The "alternating time" and "alternating angle" values for coordination of bilateral ankles were calculated. To enable comparison of the alternating time and alternating angle applied for each subject, the data units were normalized as a percentage. We calculated the coefficient of variation (CV) values for the "alternating time" and "alternating angle"from the non-dominant (non-paretic) ankle to the dominant (paretic) ankle. This revealed the overall variation in alternating time and alternating angle on the coordination control of individuals in this study.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Barthel Index (BI)Change from Baseline at 4 weeks

Measure of physical disability used widely to assess behaviour relating to activities of daily living for stroke patients or patients with other disabling conditions. Total score ranges from 0-100.

Lower Extremity motor control of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-LE)Change from Baseline at 4 weeks

most widely used assessment of paretic limb motor impairment for persons with stroke.Scoring is based on direct observation of performance. Scale items are scored on the basis of ability to complete the item using a 3-point ordinal scale where 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially and 2=performs fully. The total scale score is 34.

Gait kinematics evaluationChange from Baseline at 4 weeks

The 10 Metre Walk Test is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in meters per second over a short distance. It can be employed to determine functional mobility, gait function.

Berg Balance Test (BBS)Change from Baseline at 4 weeks

A representative method for assessing the balance ability of stroke patients. Patients receive a score from 0-4 on their ability to meet these balance dimensions. A global score can be calculated out of 56. A score of 0 represents an inability to complete the item, and a score of 56 represents the ability to independently complete the item.

Time Up and Go Test (Time Up and Go, TUG)Change from Baseline at 4 weeks

To determine fall risk and measure the progress of balance, sit to stand and walking.The individual must stand up from a chair (which should not be leaned up against a wall), walk a distance of 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down. The score consists of the time taken to complete the test activity, in seconds and ≥12 seconds to complete the TUG is at risk for falling.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Chang Jia Lan

🇨🇳

New Taipei City, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taiwan

Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital

🇨🇳

New Taipei City, Taiwan

Chang Jia Lan
🇨🇳New Taipei City, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taiwan
CHANG JIALAN, master
Contact
+88622490088
08173@s.tmu.edu.tw

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.