MedPath

Transient Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock

Conditions
Acute Cardiogenic Shock
Registration Number
NCT03528291
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier
Brief Summary

The purpose of this multicenter prospective study is to determine if the decision of transient circulatory support (TCS) in cardiogenic shock is relevant. TCS is a recommended treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock but precise indications are not definitively founded. Some studies described patients with TCS in order to establish mortality predictive scores (ENCOURAGE, SAVE), but no study has assessed the clinical relevance of the TCS decision yet. Therefore, The investigators propose to compare the characteristics and the follow-up of patients in acute cardiogenic shock, once TCS implantation was decided or not by the heart team.

Detailed Description

This French multicenter prospective observational study is aimed at determining if the decision of transient circulatory support (TCS) in cardiogenic shock is pertinent, i.e. at least as effective as the medical treatment.

All patients with cardiogenic shock for whom indication of TCS was discussed within the multidisciplinary heart team (cardiologist, intensivist and cardiac surgeon) are consecutively included in the study.

Two groups of patients are defined:

* Patients with cardiogenic shock treated by medical treatement

* Patients with cardiogenic shock treated by TCS (extracorporeal circulatory life support and/or Impella).

The main objective is to compare mortality between the 2 groups. Secondary objectives are ICU follow-up characteristics and quality of life questionnaire at day 180.

Statistical analysis will include a propensity-matched method to compare the groups to avoid confounding factors. The number of necessary subjects (n=240, 120 in each group) was calculated assuming that TCS has a superiority of 20% in comparison with medical treatment in severe cardiogenic shock, with a study power of 80%, and an alpha risk of 5%.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
240
Inclusion Criteria
  • Cardiogenic shock :

    • Systolic BP<90mmHg despite adequate filling pressure

  • Or need of cathecolamines to maintain SBP > 90mmHg

    • Signs of right-sided and/or left-sided congestion
    • Signs of tissue hypoperfusion : oliguria, cold sweated extremities, mental confusion, dizziness, narrow pulse pressure, blood lactate > 2 mmol/L
  • Short-term mechanical circulatory support discussed by the multidisciplinary heart team

Exclusion Criteria
  • Post cardiotomy cardiogenic shock
  • Refractory cardiac arrest
  • Cardiac Arrest with No Flow >3 min and/or non shokable rythm
  • Contraindication to transient circulatory support because of comorbidities, neurological dysfunction, severe end-organ failure or aortic regurgitation
  • Pregnant or brest-feeding women,
  • Age < 18 year-old

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Hospital MortalityFrom inclusion day to day 180

Mortality rate in the 2 groups at the time of hospital discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Short term mortality rateFrom inclusion day to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) discharge or day 28 whichever came first

Mortality rate at day 28

Bleeding eventsFrom inclusion day to ICU discharge or day 28 whichever came first

Incidence of red blood cell transfusion

ICU staysFrom inclusion day to day 180

Length of stay in ICU (number of days)

Respiratory failureFrom inclusion day to ICU discharge or day 28 whichever came first

Days of mechanical ventilation

Hospital staysFrom inclusion day to day 180

Length of stay in hospital (number of days)

Long term mortality rateFrom inclusion day to day 180

Mortality rate at day 180

Acute renal failureFrom inclusion day to ICU discharge or day 28 whichever came first

Incidence of renal replacement therapy

Thromboembolic eventsFrom inclusion day to ICU discharge or day 28 whichever came first

Incidence of stroke, peripheral or mesenteric ischemia

Quality of life score SF 36From inclusion day to day 180

Quality of life, evaluated by the Short Form Survey scoring (SF36 score) using the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0, which will be sent by mail at day 180 after inclusion.

The RAND 36-Item Health Survey (Version 1.0) taps eight health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions. It also includes a single item that provides an indication of perceived change in health. Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Anesthesia-Resuscitation Arnaud de Villeneuve

šŸ‡«šŸ‡·

Montpellier, France

Ā© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath