Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02069444
NCT02069444
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of the Effects of Truview Laryngoscopy and Macintosh Larygonscopy on Intubation Difficulty Score, Intubation Duration and Intubation Quality in Pediatric Patients Between 2-12 Years

Ankara University2 sites in 1 country100 target enrollmentJanuary 2012

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
All the Pediatric Patients Needed Intubation for Surgery
Sponsor
Ankara University
Enrollment
100
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
ease laryngoscopy in children
Status
Completed
Last Updated
12 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

For endotracheal entubation in children mostly Miller and Macintosh blades have been used. On the other hand Truview EVO2 laringoscopes can maintain a better laryngeal view without having a direct sight of the airway and without having to align oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes. The aim of this study is to compare the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of intubation difficulty score, time to intubation and intubation quality score.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 2012
End Date
October 2012
Last Updated
12 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

CIGDEM YILDIRIM GUCLU

specialist anesthesiologist

Ankara University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • aged 2-12 pediatric patients

Exclusion Criteria

  • any allergy
  • difficult airway history

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

ease laryngoscopy in children

Time Frame: during laryngoscopy

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials