EUCTR2017-000066-29-DE
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Subject reported outcomes on satisfaction, efficacy and safety with Luxerm® in the field-directed treatment of thin or non-hyperkeratotic and non-pigmented Actinic Keratosis of the face or the scalp
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Thin or non-hyperkeratotic and non-pigmented Actinic Keratosis on the face and scalp
- Sponsor
- Galderma R&D
- Enrollment
- 50
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Last Updated
- 7 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •1\-Male or female age above 18 years old.
- •2\-Subject with at least 5 clinically confirmed thin or non\-hyperkeratotic and non\-pigmented actinic keratoses in an anatomical area on the face (e.g., forehead or cheek or chin) excluding nose, eyelids, lips and mucosa, or balding scalp, at baseline visit.
- •3\-Subject or caregiver capable of performing the skin preparation and Luxerm? treatment application as per the investigator instructions.
- •4\-Female subject of childbearing potential must have a negative UPT at baseline (UPT should have a sensitivity of 25 IU/L or less) and agree to be strictly abstinent or use a highly effective method of birth control during the study (i.e. progestogen\-only oral hormonal contraception; male or female condom; cap, diaphragm or sponge with spermicide; bilateral tubal ligation; combined (estrogen and progestogen\-containing) oral hormonal contraception, or injectable or implants hormonal contraception (at a stable dose for at least 1 month prior to baseline); intra\-uterine devices inserted at least 1 month prior to baseline; vasectomized partner for at least 3 months prior to baseline).
- •5\-Female subject of non\-childbearing potential, e.g.: post\-menopausal (absence of menstrual bleeding for 1 year without any other medical reason), hysterectomy or bilateral ovariectomy.
- •6\-Subject has read and signed the approved informed consent form (ICF) prior to any participation in the study.
- •7\-Subject has read and signed a Photograph Release Consent Form if he/she is willing to be photographed.
- •8\-Subject (or caregiver) willing and able to comply with all of the time commitments and procedural requirements of the clinical trial protocol.
- •Are the trial subjects under 18? no
- •Number of subjects for this age range:
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\-Subject with a clinical diagnosis of a skin disease other than AK (including non\-melanoma skin cancer) on the target anatomical area.
- •2\-Subject with severe AK (thick, hyperkeratotic AK) per anatomical area (face or scalp).
- •3\-Subject with clinical diagnosis of other skin disease on the target anatomical area.
- •4\-Subject with pigmented AK on the target anatomical area.
- •5\-Subject with melanoma at any location.
- •6\-Immunocompromised subject or requiring immunosuppressive therapies.
- •7\-Subject with porphyria; photosensitivity\- related disorders, active infectious disease.
- •8\-Subject with known or suspected hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any excipients of Luxerm® (see Summary of Product Characteristics).
- •9\-Female subject who is pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy during the study.
- •10\-Subject who has used any of the following topical preparations on the area to be treated: keratolytics including urea (greater than 5%), alpha hydroxyacids \[e.g. glycolic acid, lactic acid, etc. greater than 5%], salicylic acid (greater than 2%) within 2 days of initiation of treatment.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 4
Effectiveness of long-acting paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) compared with oral antipsychotics on satisfaction, subjective well-being and service engagement in subjects with non-acute but symptomatic schizophrenia.ACTRN12618001113246Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin70
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Investigation of satisfaction and efficacy after switching from daily DPP-4 inhibitors to weekly trelagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes -prospective observational studytype 2 diabetes mellitusJPRN-UMIN000022858Hokkaido University Hospital48
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Evaluation of Treatment Satisfaction, Effectiveness and Tolerability in Subjects treated with Low-dose Diclofenac Epolamine Soft Capsules for Acute, Mild or Moderate Musculoskeletal PaiEUCTR2018-004886-15-ITIBSA INSTITUT BIOCHIMIQUE SA200
Completed
Not Applicable
Functional outcomes, treatment satisfaction, decisional regret, and the impact of institutional factors after robotic vs. retropubic radical prostatectomy: a 5 year follow-up of the HAROW studyC61Malignant neoplasm of prostateDRKS00011501Klinik und Poliklinik für UrologieTU Dresden936
Completed
Phase 4
Investigation of satisfaction, efficacy and safety after switching from daily GLP-1 receptor agonist to weekly dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes -open label, randomized, parallel group controlled clinical studyType 2 diabetesJPRN-UMIN000024552Hokkaido University Graduate School32