跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04681196
NCT04681196已完成不适用

Evaluation of Different Effects of Nasal Versus Oronasal Mask in Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Treatment of Patients Affected by Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS).

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 61 人开始时间: 2021年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
61
试验地点
1
主要终点
differences in terms of body mass index between groups

研究概览

简要总结

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered the gold standard treatment for patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Nasal and oronasal masks are often used interchangeably and are generally believed to be equally effective; the choice of interface for OSA therapy remains largely based on clinical judgement and patients preference. However, there is increasing evidence that CPAP delivered by an oronasal mask may be less effective, requires more pressure and are worse tolerated than nasal mask. Patients with OSA on oronasal mask are also less adherent to CPAP.

Some authors have suggested that in some subjects, the CPAP was not effective when an oronasal mask was used. Moreover when pressures are increased to overcome the obstruction, a paradoxical obstruction may take place.

Specific mechanisms explaining upper-airway obstruction events remain unclear and it is not known how many patients exhibit this behavior.

This observational retrospective study is designed to compare a group of patients with obstructive sleep apnea with persistent obstructive events using oronasal masks during CPAP, that were fully recovered with the shift to nasal one with the same or also lower pressure, versus a control group of patients who did not report obstruction with oronasal masks. Aim of the study was to find differences in term of clinical, anatomical and physiological characteristics between these two groups.

详细描述

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered the gold standard treatment for patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

The treatment of OSA with CPAP was first proposed by Sullivan et al and traditionally delivered using a nasal mask because the pressure applied through the nose would be transmitted as a pneumatic splint to the back of the upper airway and would push them anteriorly.

However patients with OSA frequently present nasal obstruction and leakage of air from the mouth, and different mask interfaces have been developed, including the oronasal mask that may be used to deliver CPAP.

Nasal and oronasal masks are often used interchangeably and are generally believed to be equally effective; the choice of interface for OSA therapy remains largely based on clinical judgement and patients preference .

In our clinical practice, CPAP titration is started adapting the patient to a nasal mask but an oronasal can be selected if a patient reports inability to breathe through their nose, severe nasal obstruction, leakage of air from the mouth or from other part of the face due to anatomical variation.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • confirmed diagnosis of OSA and use of CPAP treatment
  • age> or equal to 18 years old
  • sign of informed consent

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

differences in terms of body mass index between groups

时间窗: Up to one month.

differences in terms of body mass index (BMI), measured in Kg/m2, between patients with paradox effect versus patients without paradox effect (control group); BMI considered at the time of OSA diagnosis.

differences in terms of age between groups

时间窗: Up to one month.

differences in terms of age (measured in years) between patients with paradox effect versus patients without paradox effect (control group); age considered at the time of OSA diagnosis

differences in terms of basal value of apnea-hypopnea index (OSA severity) between groups

时间窗: Up to one month.

differences in terms of basal value of apnea-hypopnea index (OSA severity) between groups. AHI considered at the time of OSA diagnosis (basal cardio-respiratory monitoring) Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) measures number of obstructive events (apnea and hypopnea) per hour during basal cardio-respiratory monitoring. AHI\> 5 is diagnostic of OSA. Severity of OSA is proportional to AHI value.

differences in terms of basal value of minimum and mean nocturnal oxygen saturation between groups.

时间窗: Up to one month.

differences in terms of basal value of minimum and mean nocturnal oxygen saturation (respectively minimum SpO2 % and mean SpO2 %) between groups.Minimum and mean Oxygen Saturation considered at the time of OSA diagnosis (basal cardio-respiratory monitoring).

differences in terms of basal value of time spent under SpO2<90% and under SpO2<80% between groups.

时间窗: Up to one month.

differences in terms of basal value of time spent under SpO2\<90% (CT90) and under SpO2\<80% (CT80) between groups.minimum and mean Oxygen Saturation considered at the time of OSA diagnosis (basal cardio-respiratory monitoring). These two parameters are expressed as % of total registration time during basal cardio-respiratory monitoring at the time od OSA diagnosis.

differences in terms of oxygen desaturation index between groups.

时间窗: Up to one month.

differences in terms of oxygen desaturation index (ODI) between groups. ODI represents number of decline of SpO2 \> or equal to 3% events per hours during basal cardio-respiratory monitoring collected at the time od OSA diagnosis.ODI considered at the time of OSA diagnosis (basal cardio-respiratory monitoring)

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Francesco Tavalazzi

Francesco Tavalazzi Principal Investigator

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Nasal Versus Oronasal Mask in Continuous Positive... | 临床试验