MedPath

Sublingual Versus Intranasal Administration of Dexmedetomidine for Sedation of Children Undergoing Dental Treatment

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Anti-anxiety Agents
Moderate Sedation
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04237532
Lead Sponsor
Nourhan M.Aly
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of Dexmedetomidine drug either used sublingually or intranasally in managing healthy children during dental treatment

Detailed Description

Each child should fulfill the requirements of having a dental condition which needs treatment in two dental sessions, where each session should not exceed thirty minutes. At the first visit ,either sublingual or intranasal Dexmedetomidine will be used, while at the second visit the alternate route will be implemented in a cross-over design. At least one week interval between the two visits will be secured.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
42
Inclusion Criteria
  • Frankl behavior rating score 2.
  • ASA I physical status.
  • Dental intervention under local anesthesia not requiring more than 30 minutes.
  • No previous dental experience.
  • Parent/guardian written consent.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Dental treatment indicated requiring general anesthesia.
  • Mouth breathers.
  • Patients with acute upper respiratory illness.
  • Medically compromised patients.
  • Cognitively impaired patients.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Sublingual DexmedetomidineSublingual Dexmedetomidine-
Intranasal DexmedetomidineIntranasal Dexmedetomidine-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Acceptance of drug administrationduring the sedation procedure

Assessed by a 4 point Likert scale as follows: 1 (Good) the child accepted the drug without any refusal. 2 (fair) the child accepted the drug with some verbal resistance. 3 (poor) the child accepted the drug with some physical resistance. 4 (refused) the child refused but drug administration was possible after persuation.

Anxiety levelduring the sedation procedure

Anxiety level during local anesthesia administration will be evaluated using Venham's clinical anxiety scale. 0: Relaxed child, 1: Uneasy, concerned, 2:Child appears scared, 3:Shows reluctance to enter situation, difficulty in correctly assessing situational threat, 4:Anxiety interferes with ability to assess situation.

Level of Sedationduring the sedation procedure

Time taken by both routes to reach the desired level of sedation using Wilton et al sedation scale and it is scored as follows: 1. Agitated: Clinging parent and/or crying. 2.Alert: Awake, but not clinging to parent may whimper but not crying. 3.Calm: Sitting or lying comfortably with eyes spontaneously open. 4.Drowsy: Sitting or lying comfortably with eyes spontaneously closing but responds to minor stimulation. 5. Asleep: Eyes closed, rousable, does not respond to minor stimulation.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

🇪🇬

Alexandria, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath