Minimally invasive gum surgeries versus conventional gum surgeries.
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitis
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/11/047517
- Lead Sponsor
- Self funded
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Open to Recruitment
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Subjects with good general health. (ASA-I and ASA-II).
Grade A and Grade B periodontists subjects. (According to Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal And Peri-Implant Diseases And Conditions.)6.
The presence of 1 deep (PD <5 mm; radiographic depth > 3 mm {horizontal}) interproximal intraosseous periodontal defect.
Limited-to-no extension of the defect on the lingual or palatal side, more on the buccal side as assessed by a preoperative bone sounding.
1. Patient-related criteria:
a. Patients who had uncontrolled systemic diseases,
b. Patients using medications affecting periodontal status,
c. Smokers
d. Pregnancy or lactating subjects.
2. Tooth-related criteria:
a. Patients with grade III mobility,
b. Teeth with furcation involvement, teeth with active caries, or other dental problems.
c. Patients with grade C periodontitis.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1) Pocket Probing depth. <br/ ><br>2) Clinical attachment level.Timepoint: Baseline <br/ ><br>3 Months <br/ ><br>6 Months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method pain perception after periodontal surgery using VAS scale.Timepoint: after surgery and 1 week after surgery.