Effectiveness of Experiential Fibrowalk Therapy
- Conditions
- Fibromyalgia
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Traditional FWBehavioral: Online FWBehavioral: Experiential FW
- Registration Number
- NCT06457633
- Brief Summary
The present project will evaluate through a randomised controlled clinical trial with 4-month follow-up, the efficacy in clinical symptoms and quality of life (3-month time horizon) of the multicomponent EXPERIENTIAL FIBROWALK programme in treating individuals diagnosed with fibromyalgia, in compare with original Fibrowalk and virtual Fibrowalk. Pre-post changes will be evaluated in various variables under investigation, will include kinesiophobia, physical function, anxiety, depression, physical dysfunction, overall impact, and symptom intensity.
The design of the present study with 3 treatment branches:
Condition or disease Fibromyalgia Intervention/treatment Behavioral: TAU + Experiential Fibrowalk Behavioral: TAU + Fibrowalk Behavioral: TAU + virtual
- Detailed Description
The objective of the Experiential Fibrolwalk study is to determine the clinical effectiveness of a new treatment protocol for individuals with fibromyalgia. This protocol was developed by identifying predictors of poor response and through collaboration between physiotherapists, clinical psychologists, and patients. The objectives of this 4-month controlled clinical trial are twofold. Firstly, it aims to assess the impact of a protocol developed collaboratively by clinical therapists and users on the quality of life of individuals with fibromyalgia. Secondly, it aims to determine the pre-post changes in kinesiophobia, physical function, anxiety, depression, physical dysfunction, overall impact, and symptom intensity. Methods and analysis: The study will involve 120 fibromyalgia patients recruited from the Central Sensitivity Syndromes Specialized Unit at Vall d'Hebron Hospital's Rheumatology Service, who will be randomly assigned to one of three study groups: TAU + Experiential Fibrowalk, TAU + Fibrowalk, TAU + virtual. A comprehensive assessment to collect functional impact, depressive-anxiety symptoms, physical function, fatigue, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophism, impression of change,quality of life variables will be conducted pre-intervention, at half of the intervention (6 weeks), post-intervention (12 weeks), and at 3-month follow-up.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 120
- Adults from 18 to 75 years-old.
- 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria + the 2011 modified ACR diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia
- Able to understand Spanish and accept to participate in the study.
- Participating in concurrent or past RCTs (previous year).
- Comorbidity with severe mental disorders (i.e. psychosis) or neurodegenerative diseases (i.e. Alzheimer) that that would limit the ability of the patient to participate in the RCT.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Traditional FW Traditional FW Group treatment protocol of 12 weekly 120 minute sessions (outdoor intervention) Online FW Online FW Group treatment protocol of 12 weekly 60 minute sessions (virtual intervention) Experiential FW Experiential FW Group treatment protocol of 12 weekly 120 minute sessions (outdoor intervention) based in no-responder predictive analysis and co-creating process
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) Change from baseline values at 3 months Standard pharmacological treatment usually provided to patients with fibromyalgia. The FIQR comprises three dimensions: physical dysfunction (scores from 0 to 30), overall impact (scores from 0 to 20), and intensity of the symptoms (scores from 0 to 50) is used to measure the impact generated by FM during the last week. It consists of 21 items, which are answered on a numerical rating scale of 11 points (from 0 to 10). Total scores can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater deterioration.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Change from baseline values at 3 months HADS is used to quantify the severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. It consists of two dimensions (anxiety and depression) of 7 items each responding on a Likert scale of 4 points. Total scores of each scale (HADS-A and HADSD) range from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms
Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS) Change from baseline values at 3 months PCS is used to evaluate catastrophic thoughts associated with pain. It consists of three dimensions (rumination, magnification, and helplessness) of 13 items in total, which are answered on a Likert scale of 5 points. Total scores on each scale range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more catastrophic thoughts
Socio-demographic questionnaire Change from baseline values at 3 months Gender, date of birth, marital status, living arrangements, educational level and employment status.
Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) (Adapted version) Change from baseline values at 3 months This is a 6-item test used to assess treatment expectations (3 items) as well as credibility (3 items). After the treatment, the test is administered with the questions reformulated in the past tense.
Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia (TSK-11) Change from baseline values at 3 months TSK-11 is used to assess fear of pain and movement. It consists of 11 items, which are answered on a Likert scale of 4 points. Total scores of each scale range from 11 to 44, where higher scores indicate a greater fear of pain and Movement.
Psychological inflexibility in pain scale (PIPS) Change from baseline values at 3 months A 12-item scale that assesses psychological inflexibility in pain patients and includes two factors: avoidance and cognitive fusion with pain. Respondents are asked to rate items on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (never true) to 7 (always true). Higher scores indicate greater levels of psychological inflexibility.
Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) Change from baseline values at 3 months Physical Function of the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) was used to measure physical function. This dimension comprises a total of 10 items, which are answered on a Likert scale of 3 points. Total scores on each scale are then transformed and can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicate better physical function.
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Change from baseline values at 3 months Change from baseline values at 6 months\] MFI is used to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Its consists in a 20-item scale designed. Participants utilize a 7-point scale to express the extent to which specific statements accurately reflect their fatigue experiences. Several positively phrased items are reverse-scored. Greater overall scores indicate higher levels of fatigue severity.
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Change from baseline values at 3 months Is a measure that has been frequently used as indicators of meaningful overall change \[on a 7-point Likert scale, from 1 = "Much better" to 7 = "Much worse"\] in treatments for chronic pain.
Pain Specific Impression of Change (PSIC) Change from baseline values at 3 months The PSIC asks about the impression of change in more specific domains than PGIC: physical and social functioning, work-related activities, mood, and pain \[on a 7-point Likert scale, from 1 = "Much better" to 7 = "Much worse"\].
Adverse effects of treatments Change from baseline values at 3 months Ad hoc measure to check for the presence of negative effects of psychological treatments.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
šŖšøBarcelona, Spain