MedPath

The Influence of Treatment Position (Prone vs. Supine) on Whole Breast Target

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Interventions
Device: dedicated treatment board with no degree
Registration Number
NCT05609058
Lead Sponsor
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Brief Summary

Radiotherapy after breast conserving therapy plays an important role in early stage breast cancer patients. It not only results in a reduction in local and regional recurrence but also decrease the death rate effectively. For adjuvant radiotherapy, supine positioning is the most common approach and has multiple advantages. Due to deformability and softness of the breast, during simulation and treatment in supine position, the breast stretches over the chest wall, especially in patients with large and pendulous glands. Thus the organs at risk (OARs) received dose increased. The radiotherapeutic toxicity are unavoidable. Some present studies show that the prone positioning of patients can improve dose homogeneity and reduce the dose distribution in OARs in patients with large and pendulous glands. Chinese women have relatively small breasts, the advantages of those have not been established. Therefore, investigators compared the parameters between supine and prone positions for whole breast irradiation after conserving surgery.

Detailed Description

Objective To investigate the difference of target volumes and dosimetric parameters between supine and prone positions for whole breast irradiation after conserving surgery.

Methods Breast cancer patients with T1-2N0M0 stage who underwent radiation therapy after conserving surgery were enrolled. Supine and Prone scan sets were acquired during free breathing for all patients. Target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) including heart, ipsilateral lung and bilateral breast were contoured by the same radiation oncologist. The tumor bed (TB) was determined based on surgical clips. The Clinical target volume (CTV)consisted of the whole breast. The planning target volume (PTV) was CTV plus 0.5cm. The boost of PTV (PTVboost) was TB plus 0.5cm. Dosimetric parameters of target volumes and OARs were compared between supine and prone position.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
300
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Breast cancer patients with T1-T2N0M0 stage who underwent radiation therapy after conserving surgery
  2. exhibited normal arm movement aſter surgery
  3. had no chronic lung diseases
  4. Written informed consent forms
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Breast cancer patients with radical surgery
  2. could not exhibit normal arm movement after surgery
  3. had chronic lung diseases
  4. refused informed consent forms

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Breast cancer underwent scanning in the supine positiondedicated treatment board with no degreeBreast cancer patients with T1-2N0M0 stage who underwent radiation therapy after conserving surgery were enrolled. Supine scan sets were acquired during free breathing for all patients. Target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) including heart, ipsilateral lung and bilateral breast were contoured by the same radiation oncologist. The tumor bed (TB) was determined based on surgical clips. The Clinical target volume (CTV)consisted of the whole breast. The planning target volume (PTV) was CTV plus 0.5cm. The boost of PTV (PTVboost) was TB plus 0.5cm.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
dose distribution of GTV1 year

the difference of GTV (Gross tumor target) between two plans

dose distribution of CTV1 year

the difference of CTV (clinical target volume) between two plans

dose distribution of ipsilateral lung1 year

the difference of ipsilateral lung dose distribution between two plans

dose distribution of heart1 year

the difference of heart dose distribution between two plans

dose distribution of bilateral breasts1 year

the difference of bilateral breasts dose distribution between two plans

dose distribution of PTV1 year

the difference of PTV (planing target volume) between two plans

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Shanxi provicial cancer hospital

🇨🇳

Taiyuan, Shanxi, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath