MedPath

Online Field Test of an Appendicitis Decision Support Tool

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Appendicitis Acute
Interventions
Behavioral: Appendicitis Decision Support Tool
Behavioral: Control Infographic
Registration Number
NCT05219786
Lead Sponsor
University of Washington
Brief Summary

After the recent publication of the CODA Trial comparing antibiotics and surgery for acute appendicitis, the investigators developed a comprehensive decision support tool. This tool will help patients understand the risks and benefits of each treatment and make a treatment decision. This study is an online randomized field test comparing the decision support tool to a control infographic and assessing it's affect on decisional outcomes, such as decisional conflict.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
194
Inclusion Criteria

who live in the United States and who have not previously had appendicitis.

  • Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turk Platform with an approval rating of 95% or higher
  • Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turk Platform who live in the United States
  • Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turn Platform who have not previously had appendicitis
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Employees or relatives of employees of the University of Washington
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Decision Support ToolAppendicitis Decision Support ToolIn this arm study participants saw a decision support tool consisting of a video and a interactive decision aid (www.appyornot.org).
InfographicControl InfographicParticipant saw a static infographic providing information about the two treatments for appendicitis.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Decisional Conflict Pre vs. Post InterventionAt time of enrollment

Assessed using the validated decisional conflict scale comparing only participants in the intervention arm before and after viewing the decision support tool.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Trust and Accuracy of InformationAt time of enrollment

Participants perception of the trustworthiness and accuracy of the information presented to them on a 5 point scale with higher scores representing a higher perceived trustworthiness and perceived accuracy.

AcceptabilityAt time of enrollment

Between arm comparison of the acceptability of the information presented to the participants rated on a 4 point acceptability scale with higher scores representing higher acceptability.

Decisional Conflict Between ArmsAt time of enrollment

Total score on the validated decisional conflict scale after viewing the intervention support tool or the control infographic. Scale ranges from 0-100 with higher scores being worse.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Washington

🇺🇸

Seattle, Washington, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath