Online Field Test of an Appendicitis Decision Support Tool
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 194
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Decisional Conflict Pre vs. Post Intervention
研究概览
简要总结
After the recent publication of the CODA Trial comparing antibiotics and surgery for acute appendicitis, the investigators developed a comprehensive decision support tool. This tool will help patients understand the risks and benefits of each treatment and make a treatment decision. This study is an online randomized field test comparing the decision support tool to a control infographic and assessing it's affect on decisional outcomes, such as decisional conflict.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •who live in the United States and who have not previously had appendicitis.
- •Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turk Platform with an approval rating of 95% or higher
- •Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turk Platform who live in the United States
- •Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turn Platform who have not previously had appendicitis
排除标准
- •Employees or relatives of employees of the University of Washington
结局指标
主要结局
Decisional Conflict Pre vs. Post Intervention
时间窗: At time of enrollment
Assessed using the validated decisional conflict scale comparing only participants in the intervention arm before and after viewing the decision support tool.
次要结局
- Acceptability(At time of enrollment)
- Decisional Conflict Between Arms(At time of enrollment)
- Trust and Accuracy of Information(At time of enrollment)
研究者
David Flum
Professor of Surgery
University of Washington