Online Field Test of an Appendicitis Decision Support Tool
- Conditions
- Appendicitis Acute
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Appendicitis Decision Support ToolBehavioral: Control Infographic
- Registration Number
- NCT05219786
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Washington
- Brief Summary
After the recent publication of the CODA Trial comparing antibiotics and surgery for acute appendicitis, the investigators developed a comprehensive decision support tool. This tool will help patients understand the risks and benefits of each treatment and make a treatment decision. This study is an online randomized field test comparing the decision support tool to a control infographic and assessing it's affect on decisional outcomes, such as decisional conflict.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 194
who live in the United States and who have not previously had appendicitis.
- Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turk Platform with an approval rating of 95% or higher
- Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turk Platform who live in the United States
- Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turn Platform who have not previously had appendicitis
- Employees or relatives of employees of the University of Washington
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Decision Support Tool Appendicitis Decision Support Tool In this arm study participants saw a decision support tool consisting of a video and a interactive decision aid (www.appyornot.org). Infographic Control Infographic Participant saw a static infographic providing information about the two treatments for appendicitis.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Decisional Conflict Pre vs. Post Intervention At time of enrollment Assessed using the validated decisional conflict scale comparing only participants in the intervention arm before and after viewing the decision support tool.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Trust and Accuracy of Information At time of enrollment Participants perception of the trustworthiness and accuracy of the information presented to them on a 5 point scale with higher scores representing a higher perceived trustworthiness and perceived accuracy.
Acceptability At time of enrollment Between arm comparison of the acceptability of the information presented to the participants rated on a 4 point acceptability scale with higher scores representing higher acceptability.
Decisional Conflict Between Arms At time of enrollment Total score on the validated decisional conflict scale after viewing the intervention support tool or the control infographic. Scale ranges from 0-100 with higher scores being worse.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Washington
🇺🇸Seattle, Washington, United States