MedPath

Split-face Study: Cosmetic Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection Under Electromyography-guidance Versus Conventional Palpation Technique

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Glabellar Frown Lines
Rhytides
Facial Expression
Wrinkle
Interventions
Device: Electromyography-Needle Intramuscular Drug guidance
Registration Number
NCT05517538
Lead Sponsor
Mohamed Hayder Oleish Salih
Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to compare between the conventional palpation method of botulinum toxin type A injection and the electromyography-guided method using clinical parameters and electromyography analysis.

Detailed Description

The study was conducted on 15 healthy-looking female subjects with visible glabellar rhytids when frowning. All participants were recruited from the outpatient clinic of Dermatology Department, Main University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University. The mean age was 46.27 ± 6.31 with a range from 33 to 59 years. All 15 subjects completed the study.

Each subject provided a right and left corrugator supercilii muscles to the study. Each muscle was divided into a body and a tail, each part injected separately (n=60).

Neurotoxin injection into the corrugator body and tail by palpation method on one side and under EMG-guidance on the other.

Photographs were taken both at rest, and while frowning at each visit: pre-operatively, after 2 weeks and after 3 months.

Clinical grading according to static and dynamic Merz glabellar frown line scales and EMG analysis was done at each visit: pre-operatively, after 2 weeks and after 3 months.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
15
Inclusion Criteria
  • Consent.
  • Patients within age range of 25 - 60 years.
  • Visible corrugator muscle rhytids when frowning by examination.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with no, or minimal wrinkles on the studied area.
  • Previous use of botulinum toxin in the previous 6 months.
  • Patients on regular or very occasional antispasmodics.
  • Patients with any neuromuscular disorders, infections or skin problems at the injection site.
  • Patients with any known neurological disease.
  • Patients who undergone surgery involving the glabellar area.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
EMG-guidedElectromyography-Needle Intramuscular Drug guidanceinjected with the EMG-guided Method of neurotoxin adminstration
Palpation-guidedBotulinum toxin type Ainjected with the Palpation Method of neurotoxin adminstration
EMG-guidedBotulinum toxin type Ainjected with the EMG-guided Method of neurotoxin adminstration
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Interferance pattern Envelop amplitude (IPEA)3 months

difference between + and - spikes in the EMG waveform \[microvolt\]

Muscle activity percentage (MAp)3 months

percentage difference between the IPEA at follow up and base line \[%\]

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Glabellar Merz scales3 months

Glabellar Merz scales : Dunamic and static \[0-4\]

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of medicine

🇪🇬

Alexandria, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath