'HjertensGlad'.Inequality in Cardiac Rehabilitation Attendance: Peer-mentors as a Feasible Solution
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 20
- 试验地点
- 4
- 主要终点
- Content of contacts
研究概览
简要总结
BACKGROUND: Advanced treatment regimens have reduced cardiovascular mortality resulting in an increasingly older myocardial infarction (MI) population in need of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) , the majority (74%) is above 60 years. The positive effect of CR is well established; CR reduces cardiovascular mortality, lowers hospital admissions, and improves quality of life among patients with ischemic heart disease. These positive effects of CR has also been established among older patients. The inherent problem lies in the low attendance rate, often below 50%. Several studies, including studies from Denmark, have shown that low participation in CR is most prevalent among older, vulnerable female patients. The notion vulnerable covers patients with low socioeconomic position (SEP), patients with non-western background and patients living alone, as these groups have particularly low CR attendance. Effective interventions aiming at increasing CR attendance among these low attending groups are thus warranted and the current study will seek to address this.
AIM: To test feasibility and acceptability of methods used in a peer-mentor intervention among older female and vulnerable post MI patients.
DESIGN AND METHODS: The study is designed as a one arm feasibility study. Patients (n=20) are recruited by a dedicated research nurse before discharge from the cardiology department at Nordsjællands Hospital. Data is collected at three timepoints, baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks. The patients (mentees) are matched with peer-mentors. Peer-mentoring (i.e. mentoring by a person with a similar life situation or health problem as one self) is a low-cost intervention that holds the potential to improve CR attendance and improve physical and psychological outcomes among older patients. Peer-mentors are role models who can guide and support patients overcoming barriers of CR attendance. Peer-mentoring is unexplored in a CR setting among older, female and vulnerable MI patients; establishing the novelty of the current study.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 65 Years 至 —(Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •≥65 years and diagnosed with MI and referred to CR and female or low SEP or single living or non-western background.
排除标准
- •Patients unable to provide written consent.
结局指标
主要结局
Content of contacts
时间窗: 24 weeks
Content of contacts between patient and peer-mentor will be assessed through open ended question on questionnaire i.e. 'What was the content of your meeting? e.g face-to-face meeting with conversation about everyday life'
Change in symptoms of anxiety and depression
时间窗: Baseline to 24 weeks
Measured using the questionnaire 'The hospital anxiety and depression scale' (HADS). Min. score: 0, max score 42. Lower scores indicating a better outcome
CR attendance
时间窗: 24 weeks
Measured as 'self-reported CR attendance'
Change in Health-related Quality of Life
时间窗: Baseline to 24 weeks
Measured using the 'HeartQoL' 'Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire'. Min. score: 0, max score: 42. Higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Change in Self-efficacy
时间窗: Baseline to 24 weeks
Measured using the questionnaire 'General self-efficacy scale'. Min score: 10, max score: 40. Higher scores indicating a better outcome
Change in dietary quality
时间窗: Baseline to 24 weeks
Measured using the questionnaire 'Heartdiet'. Higher scores indicating a better outcome
Recruitment
时间窗: Baseline
Number of patients included from eligible patients
Satisfaction with intervention
时间窗: 12 weeks
Semi-structured qualitative interviews with patients
Number of contacts
时间窗: 24 weeks
Number of contacts between patient and peer-mentor
Change in physical activity
时间窗: Baseline to 24 weeks
Measured using the questionnaire 'Heartdiet'. Higher scores indicating a better outcome
Dropout
时间窗: 24 weeks
Number of patients not completing the intervention
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Maria Kjøller Pedersen
Assistant Professor
University College Copenhagen
