Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04507529
NCT04507529
Completed
N/A

'HjertensGlad'.Inequality in Cardiac Rehabilitation Attendance: Peer-mentors as a Feasible Solution

University College Copenhagen2 sites in 1 country20 target enrollmentSeptember 7, 2020

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Myocardial Infarction
Sponsor
University College Copenhagen
Enrollment
20
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Content of contacts
Status
Completed
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

BACKGROUND: Advanced treatment regimens have reduced cardiovascular mortality resulting in an increasingly older myocardial infarction (MI) population in need of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) , the majority (74%) is above 60 years. The positive effect of CR is well established; CR reduces cardiovascular mortality, lowers hospital admissions, and improves quality of life among patients with ischemic heart disease. These positive effects of CR has also been established among older patients. The inherent problem lies in the low attendance rate, often below 50%. Several studies, including studies from Denmark, have shown that low participation in CR is most prevalent among older, vulnerable female patients. The notion vulnerable covers patients with low socioeconomic position (SEP), patients with non-western background and patients living alone, as these groups have particularly low CR attendance. Effective interventions aiming at increasing CR attendance among these low attending groups are thus warranted and the current study will seek to address this.

AIM: To test feasibility and acceptability of methods used in a peer-mentor intervention among older female and vulnerable post MI patients.

DESIGN AND METHODS: The study is designed as a one arm feasibility study. Patients (n=20) are recruited by a dedicated research nurse before discharge from the cardiology department at Nordsjællands Hospital. Data is collected at three timepoints, baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks. The patients (mentees) are matched with peer-mentors. Peer-mentoring (i.e. mentoring by a person with a similar life situation or health problem as one self) is a low-cost intervention that holds the potential to improve CR attendance and improve physical and psychological outcomes among older patients. Peer-mentors are role models who can guide and support patients overcoming barriers of CR attendance. Peer-mentoring is unexplored in a CR setting among older, female and vulnerable MI patients; establishing the novelty of the current study.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 7, 2020
End Date
June 21, 2021
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
University College Copenhagen
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Maria Kjøller Pedersen

Assistant Professor

University College Copenhagen

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • ≥65 years and diagnosed with MI and referred to CR and female or low SEP or single living or non-western background.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients unable to provide written consent.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Content of contacts

Time Frame: 24 weeks

Content of contacts between patient and peer-mentor will be assessed through open ended question on questionnaire i.e. 'What was the content of your meeting? e.g face-to-face meeting with conversation about everyday life'

Change in symptoms of anxiety and depression

Time Frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

Measured using the questionnaire 'The hospital anxiety and depression scale' (HADS). Min. score: 0, max score 42. Lower scores indicating a better outcome

CR attendance

Time Frame: 24 weeks

Measured as 'self-reported CR attendance'

Change in Health-related Quality of Life

Time Frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

Measured using the 'HeartQoL' 'Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire'. Min. score: 0, max score: 42. Higher scores indicating a better outcome.

Change in Self-efficacy

Time Frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

Measured using the questionnaire 'General self-efficacy scale'. Min score: 10, max score: 40. Higher scores indicating a better outcome

Change in dietary quality

Time Frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

Measured using the questionnaire 'Heartdiet'. Higher scores indicating a better outcome

Recruitment

Time Frame: Baseline

Number of patients included from eligible patients

Satisfaction with intervention

Time Frame: 12 weeks

Semi-structured qualitative interviews with patients

Number of contacts

Time Frame: 24 weeks

Number of contacts between patient and peer-mentor

Change in physical activity

Time Frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

Measured using the questionnaire 'Heartdiet'. Higher scores indicating a better outcome

Dropout

Time Frame: 24 weeks

Number of patients not completing the intervention

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials