A Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab Produced by Two Different Processes in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
Phase 3
Completed
- Conditions
- Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT02157948
- Lead Sponsor
- Amgen
- Brief Summary
This study will compare the effect of denosumab produced by two different manufacturing processes on bone mineral density at the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 394
Inclusion Criteria
- Subject has provided informed consent prior to any study-specific activities/procedures
- Ambulatory postmenopausal women.
- Age 55 years or older
- Screening BMD value equivalent to a T-score less than or equal to -2.5 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck.
Exclusion Criteria
- Administration of osteoporosis treatments or bone active treatments within specific timeframes
- Vitamin D deficiency
- Diseases and conditions that affect bone metabolism (e.g., hypo/hyper-parathyroidism; hypo/hyperthyroidism, unless stable and well-controlled)
- Contraindications to denosumab therapy (e.g., hypocalcemia)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Denosumab CP2 Denosumab (CP2) Participants received 60 mg denosumab manufactured using the current CP2 process subcutaneously once every 6 months for 1 year. Denosumab CP4 Denosumab (CP4) Participants received 60 mg denosumab manufactured using the new CP4 process subcutaneously once every 6 months for 1 year.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD Baseline and Month 12 Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging center.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type I Collagen C-telopeptide (sCTX) Baseline, month 1, month 6 and month 12 Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen Type 1 N-terminal Propeptide (P1NP) Baseline, month 1, month 6 and month 12
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms by which denosumab (CP2 and CP4) modulate RANKL signaling in postmenopausal osteoporosis?
How does the efficacy of denosumab (CP2 and CP4) compare to bisphosphonates in improving lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women?
Which biomarkers correlate with response to denosumab (CP2 and CP4) in RANKL inhibition for osteoporosis treatment?
What are the potential adverse events associated with denosumab (CP2 and CP4) in phase 3 trials for postmenopausal osteoporosis?
How do denosumab manufacturing processes (CP2 vs CP4) impact drug stability and therapeutic outcomes in RANKL-targeted osteoporosis treatment?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Research Site
🇵🇱Warszawa, Poland
Research Site🇵🇱Warszawa, Poland