临床试验/CTRI/2024/11/076521

CTRI/2024/11/076521尚未招募不适用

Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure at head rotation with LMA Prosealâ„¢ and I-gelÂ®

PT B.D Sharma, PGIMS Rohtak1 个研究点分布在 1 个国家目标入组 70 人开始时间: 2024年11月15日最近更新: 2024年10月28日

试验速览

阶段: 不适用
状态: 尚未招募
发起方
入组人数: 70
试验地点: 1
主要终点: To compare the difference in oropharyngeal leak pressure with head rotation using LMA Proseal

研究概览研究设计入排标准结局指标研究者研究点记录与标识符相似试验

研究概览

简要总结

This prospective, single centre, parallel group randomized study will be

conducted in Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak

after obtaining approval from institutional Ethical Committee.

研究设计

研究类型: Interventional
分配方式: Randomized
盲法: Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围: 18.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)（—）
性别: All

入选标准

•Age group 18-70 years of either gender weighing 50-70 kg belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status I and II, and MPG I&II scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia.

排除标准

•Patients who do not give consent, difficult airway, patient at high risk of pulmonary aspiration, high risk of barotrauma, inadequate fasting, cervical spine disorders or restricted range of head movement, mouth opening less than 3cm, morbid Obesity ( BMI more than 30 kg per metre square ),patients with loose dentures, pregnancy, edentulous, being considered unsuitable for supraglottic airway device insertion by attending anaesthesiologists.

结局指标

主要结局

To compare the difference in oropharyngeal leak pressure with head rotation using LMA Proseal

时间窗: 5 minutes after insertion of Supraglttic Airway device

and i-gel.

时间窗: 5 minutes after insertion of Supraglttic Airway device

次要结局

Insertion time of Supraglottic airway device, ease and attempts of insertion of(Supraglottic airway device, Oropharyngeal leak pressure, ventilation score, fiberoptic)

研究者

发起方

PT B.D Sharma, PGIMS Rohtak

申办方类型

Government medical college

责任方

Principal Investigator

主要研究者

Dr Kirti Kshetrapal

Pt B.D Sharma PGIMS Rohtak

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

已完成

2/3 期

Comparison of Efficacy between Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Blockbuster Laryngeal mask Airway in Different Head and Neck Positions

CTRI/2024/03/064792Riddhi Rajan90

尚未招募

不适用

A study comparing two types of airway devices air-q and I-gel used to help children breathe safely during general anaesthesia

CTRI/2025/11/097055SMS MEDICAL COLLEGE AND ATTACHED HOSPITAL, JAIPUR70

尚未招募

不适用

Comparison of two airway devices for maintaining seal during head rotation in patients under general anaesthesia.

CTRI/2025/08/093000Maulana Azad Medical College and associated hospitals154

尚未招募

不适用

A study comparing the effectiveness and performance of two airway devices i gel and baska mask in laparoscopic appendicectomy under general anaesthesia

CTRI/2025/09/094680GMERS HOSPITAL50

尚未招募

2 期

Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure using i-Gel in blind technique vs video laryngoscope technique in paediatric patients undergoing Laparoscopic surgeries

CTRI/2025/01/079725Armed Forces Medical College40