Study of Surgery in Patients With Idiopathic Macular Hole
- Conditions
- Idiopathic Macular HoleSurgery
- Interventions
- Procedure: ILM peeling surgery
- Registration Number
- NCT02905409
- Lead Sponsor
- Peking University People's Hospital
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of two different internal limiting membrane peeling with distinct diameters after macular hole surgery on anatomical closure grades.
- Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to investigate two distinct diameter of internal limiting membrane peeling on anatomical outcomes of macular hole surgery with different preoperative idiopathic macular hole.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 228
- patients with IMH
- patients signed the ICF
- patients with course of IMH less than 3 years
- patients with hyper myopia
- patients with traumatic macular hole
- accompanied or secondary of other fundus disease
- open or reopen after receiving MH surgery
- patients with retinal detachment
- received vitrectomy due to other diseases
- glaucoma cannot be controled by medication
- patients with other retinal or choroidal disease that may affect VA
- poor patients compliance
- poor condition that cannot undertake the surgery
- dioptric media opacities which make it difficult to exam fundus or measure on OCT
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 2PD diameter of ILM peeling in surgery ILM peeling surgery Patients were stratified according to the macular hole closure index(MHCI) measured by OCT into 3 subgroup (MHCI\<0.5, 0.5≤MHCI\<0.7, MHCI≥0.7 ). And then randomized into 2 different intervention groups. If randomized into 2PD (papillary diameter) group, patients were given 2PD diameter of ILM (internal limiting membrane) peeling in surgery. 4PD diameter of ILM peeling in surgery ILM peeling surgery Patients were stratified according to the macular hole closure index(MHCI) measured by OCT into 3 subgroup (MHCI\<0.5, 0.5≤MHCI\<0.7, MHCI≥0.7 ). And then randomized into 2 different intervention groups. If randomized into 4PD (papillary diameter) group, patients were given 4PD diameter of ILM (internal limiting membrane) peeling in surgery.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Anatomical closure grades in OCT 6 months The anatomical outcomes were defined as good closure and poor closure.
Change of anatomical closure grades in OCT 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year The anatomical outcomes were defined as good closure and poor closure.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline in BCVA (best corrected visual acuity). 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year BCVA were measured by ETDRS chart.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
People's Hospital of Peking University
🇨🇳Beijing, Beijing, China