跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00906139
NCT00906139Unknown4 期

Propofol and Fentanyl Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl for Sedation During Diagnostic or Therapeutic Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients

Federal University of São Paulo1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 210 人开始时间: 2008年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
发起方
入组人数
210
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare propofol and fentanyl versus midazolam and fentanyl regarding safety and efficiency

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to compare propofol associated with fentanyl versus midazolam plus fentanyl for sedation during diagnosis or therapeutic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) in cirrhotic patients.

详细描述

UGE is often performed in cirrhotic patients for the diagnosis and treatment of portal hypertension complications. Current data suggests that propofol sedation may have advantages over benzodiazepines. However, there are few reports comparing propofol versus midazolam in patients with liver cirrhosis. The study's objective is to compare propofol associated with fentanyl versus midazolam plus fentanyl for sedation during diagnosis or therapeutic UGE in cirrhotic patients. A prospective randomized study will include cirrhotic patients (Child A, B or C and ASA 2 or 3), referred for diagnostic or therapeutic UGE, randomized for group I: propofol (0,5 mg/kg up to 400 mg) and fentanyl (0,05 mg); or group II: midazolam (0,1 mg/kg) and fentanyl. Sedation was performed by an exclusively dedicated gastroenterologist. Efficacy (completion of procedures), complications (hypoxemia, hypotension, arrhythmias) and recovery time (elapsed from the end of the procedure and discharge) will be studied.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Liver cirrhosis, any etiology
  • ASA II or III
  • Child A, B or C
  • Age between 18 years and 75 years
  • Patients that agree in participate of study and signed the contentment term

排除标准

  • Schistosomiasis
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Contraindications to drugs
  • ASA IV or V
  • Hepatic encephalopathy, neurologic diseases
  • Opioids, narcotics, MAO inhibitors or benzodiazepines use
  • Alcohol abuse

研究组 & 干预措施

Propofol

Active Comparator

To receive propofol (0.5 mg/kg up to 400 mg) and fentanyl (0.05 mg);

干预措施: Propofol (Drug)

Propofol

Active Comparator

To receive propofol (0.5 mg/kg up to 400 mg) and fentanyl (0.05 mg);

干预措施: Fentanyl (Drug)

Midazolam

Active Comparator

To receive midazolam (0.1 mg/kg) and fentanyl (0.05 mg).

干预措施: Midazolam (Drug)

Midazolam

Active Comparator

To receive midazolam (0.1 mg/kg) and fentanyl (0.05 mg).

干预措施: Fentanyl (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

To compare propofol and fentanyl versus midazolam and fentanyl regarding safety and efficiency

时间窗: Three months

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Federal University of São Paulo
申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Propofol and Fentanyl Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl... | 临床试验