A randomised controlled trial comparing two insertion techniques for the Laryngeal Mask Airway : standard (index finger insertion) technique versus tongue depressor insertion technique
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- KCT0004964
- Lead Sponsor
- Hanyang University Seoul Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot yet recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 154
Inclusion Criteria
American Society of Anesthesiologist(ASA) physical status classification system) I - II
-18 years old to under 70 years
- Body mass index less than 30 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients who refuse to participate
- Patients whose mouth does not open more than 2.5 cm
- Patients at risk of aspiration of stomach contents
- Pregnant women
- Patients under 45kg or over 100kg
- Patients with lung disease
- Surgery other than the supine position
- Patients who are expected to have difficulty ventilating or positive pressure mask ventilation
- Patients with cervical and upper and lower airway abnormality
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational Study
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Success rate of laryngeal mask airway insertion
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Insertion time;Vital sign;oropharyngeal leak pressure;Airway complications after surgery (Bleeding, sore throat, difficulty swallowing, speech disorders, etc.);Evaluation of the larynx with flexible bronchoscopy