MedPath

Is Univalving or Bivalving of Long Arm Casts for Forearm Fractures Necessary?

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Fracture of Shaft of Radius and/or Ulna
Metaphyseal Fracture of Bone of Upper Limb
Fracture of Upper Limb, Level Unspecified
Interventions
Procedure: No Split Cast of forearm fractures
Procedure: Bivalve Split Cast of forearm fractures
Procedure: Univalve Split Cast of forearm fractures
Registration Number
NCT02614690
Lead Sponsor
Connecticut Children's Medical Center
Brief Summary

This study aims to examine the need for univalve or bivalve splitting of casts in pediatric patients with forearm fractures following closed reduction and cast application in a randomized, prospective fashion.

Detailed Description

Following cast application, little is known regarding the need to split the cast, either in a univalve (a split along a single side of the cast) or bivalve (a split along both sides of the cast) fashion. Theoretically, the splitting of the cast allows for expansion and soft tissue swelling. However, review of the literature yields a paucity of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of splitting a cast. In a study by Nietosvaara et. al, a retrospective examination of 109 pediatric patients initially treated with closed cylindrical casting for closed forearm fractures were evaluated. Of these 109 patients, one-sixth required the initial cast to be split, trimmed, or removed secondary to post-traumatic swelling.

However, the splitting of a cast is not without risks in itself. Once the initial swelling dissipates, a univalved or bivalved cast can become excessively loose. This loosening has been associated with a loss of reduction. If the loss or reduction is substantial, it may require a re-reduction or operation to correct. In addition, with every use of the cast saw a patient is placed at risk for iatrogenic cast saw injury. Thermal burns and abrasions from cast saws can cause lifelong emotional and physical scars for a patient. They can also be an inciting event for litigation against the hospital and or provider, with settlements averaging greater than $12,000 per centimeter of cast saw injury.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • A closed isolated radial and/or ulna fracture of the forearm inclusive of metaphyseal and/or shaft level fractures.
  • Forearm fractures that require closed reduction (with or without conscious sedation)
  • Patients between the ages of 3 and 12 years old
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Specific exclusions

    • Age less than 3 or greater than 12
    • Patients presenting with an associated neurological or vascular injury caused by the fracture
    • Patients presenting with an open fracture
    • Patients requiring operative treatment following the initial fracture evaluation
    • Ipsilateral upper extremity fracture
    • Patients intubated or with a pre-existing condition that prevents them from verbalizing symptoms of discomfort
  2. Generic exclusion: "Subjects not meeting all inclusion criteria."

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
No split Cast of forearm fracturesNo Split Cast of forearm fracturesPatient will have a "No split cast" long arm cast applied after a closed reduction of forearm fractures. The cast will not be split. 20 patients will be randomized to this arm.
Bivalve Split Cast of forearm fracturesBivalve Split Cast of forearm fracturesPatients will have a "Bivalve Split Cast" long arm cast applied after they have undergone a closed reduction of of forearm fractures. This is a cast that will be split on both sides of the cast. 20 patients will be randomized to the bivalve split arm cast.
Univalve Split Cast of forearm fracturesUnivalve Split Cast of forearm fracturesPatients will have a "Univalve Split Cast" long arm cast applied after undergoing closed reduction of of forearm fractures. This is a cast that is split on only one side of the cast. 20 patients will be randomized to this arm
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Complication Rate of the Cast Type<60 days corresponding to total study time and consistent with outcome 6

This data will be able to help physicians and ER personnel help this patient population with the least number of cast complications and therefore allow for a more efficient use of resources since cast modifications could be minimized. Metrics used to characterize complications are the radiographic union used to determine speed of healing and the number of unplanned ER or clinic visits for cast modifications.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Connecticut Children's Medical Center

🇺🇸

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath