Randomized Clinical Trial of Suprapapillary Drainage With Metal Stent vs. Routine Internal-External Transpapillary Drainage in Patients With Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 84
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Acute cholangitis
研究概览
简要总结
Malignant hilar biliary obstruction is a condition in which the bile ducts near the liver become blocked due to cancer. This blockage can lead to jaundice (yellowing of the skin and eyes), itching, infection, and impaired liver function. To relieve the obstruction, doctors commonly perform procedures to drain bile and restore its flow.
There are different techniques available for biliary drainage. One common method is percutaneous transpapillary internal-external drainage, in which a catheter is placed through the liver and across the natural opening of the bile duct into the intestine. Another approach is percutaneous suprapapillary drainage using a self-expanding metal stent, which allows bile to drain without crossing into the intestine and may reduce the risk of contamination and infection.
Currently, there is no clear consensus on which of these two techniques is safer or more effective for patients with malignant proximal biliary obstruction. Some studies suggest that avoiding manipulation of the intestinal opening of the bile duct may reduce complications such as infection, but high-quality comparative evidence is lacking.
The purpose of this study is to compare percutaneous suprapapillary drainage with a self-expanding metal stent versus routine percutaneous transpapillary internal-external drainage in patients with malignant proximal biliary obstruction. The study aims to compare the rate of drainage-related complications between the two techniques, as well as to evaluate treatment success, stent patency, and the need for reintervention. In addition, in patients with potentially resectable disease undergoing preoperative biliary drainage, the study will assess and compare surgical outcomes between the two approaches. The results of this study may help determine the safest and most effective drainage strategy for these patients and improve future clinical decision-making.
详细描述
Malignant hilar biliary obstruction is most commonly associated with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and represents a complex clinical condition characterized by impaired bile flow at or above the hepatic duct confluence. The resulting cholestasis may lead to progressive hepatic dysfunction, increased risk of infectious complications, and reduced tolerance to systemic or surgical therapies. In selected patients, preoperative biliary drainage is performed to optimize liver function and reduce perioperative risk prior to major hepatectomy.
Percutaneous biliary drainage is widely used in this setting due to its ability to selectively decompress specific hepatic segments, particularly in complex hilar strictures. The conventional approach consists of transpapillary internal-external drainage, in which a catheter is advanced across the obstruction and through the papilla into the duodenum. While effective in achieving biliary decompression, this technique may disrupt the function of the sphincter of Oddi and facilitate duodenobiliary reflux, which has been implicated as a potential mechanism for infectious complications.
Percutaneous suprapapillary drainage with placement of a self-expanding metal stent represents an alternative strategy. By avoiding transpapillary manipulation, this approach preserves sphincter function and may reduce bacterial contamination of the biliary tree. Early clinical data suggest a favorable safety profile, particularly regarding infectious outcomes; however, direct comparisons with conventional transpapillary drainage remain limited, and available studies are constrained by methodological limitations.
An additional area of uncertainty relates to patients with potentially resectable disease. In this subgroup, the choice of drainage technique may influence not only peri-procedural outcomes but also subsequent surgical management. Concerns have been raised regarding the potential impact of metallic stents on operative complexity and resectability, although robust data are lacking.
This randomized clinical trial is designed to compare two percutaneous drainage strategies within a standardized institutional framework. Patients with an indication for percutaneous biliary drainage will be allocated to receive either transpapillary internal-external drainage or suprapapillary drainage with a self-expanding metal stent. The study includes both patients with unresectable disease and those with potentially resectable malignancies, allowing for evaluation across different clinical scenarios.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age >18 years.
- •Malignant proximal biliary obstruction on imaging (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography) with histopathological confirmation or high clinical and radiological suspicion.
- •Total bilirubin > 3 mg/dL.
- •Patients not candidates for potentially curative surgical resection due to locally advanced disease, metastatic disease, or inadequate clinical condition.
- •Patients with potentially resectable neoplasms, defined as the possibility of achieving complete resection (R0), who meet at least one of the following criteria:
- •5.1 Estimated future liver remnant <40%, in whom percutaneous portal vein embolization of the side to be resected will also be indicated after initial drainage.
- •5.2 Prolonged jaundice with total bilirubin >10 mg/dL for more than 14 days. 5.3 Malnutrition, defined as ≥10% unintentional weight loss or albumin <3 g/dL, presumably attributable to cholestasis.
- •5.4 Indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
排除标准
- •Tumor with distal extension to the duodenal papilla, precluding suprapapillary drainage.
- •Prior biliary drainage procedure, either percutaneous (PTBD) or endoscopic (ERCP).
- •Acute cholangitis, clinically defined as fever (axillary temperature >38°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count >10,000/mm³).
- •Uncorrectable coagulopathy.
- •Iodinated contrast allergy not amenable to desensitization.
研究组 & 干预措施
Transpapillary internal-external drainage
Participants undergo percutaneous transpapillary internal-external biliary drainage with placement of a catheter across the obstruction and through the papilla into the duodenum, according to standard institutional practice.
干预措施: Percutaneous transpapillary internal-external biliary drainage (Procedure)
Suprapapillary Self-Expanding Metal Stent Drainage
Participants undergo percutaneous suprapapillary biliary drainage with placement of a self-expanding metal stent across the obstruction without crossing the papilla.
干预措施: Percutaneous suprapapillary biliary drainage with self-expanding metal stent (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
Acute cholangitis
时间窗: Within 90 days after intervention
Defined by clinical criteria, including fever (axillary temperature \>38°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count \>10,000/mm³), in the absence of another infectious source on abdominal and chest imaging.
Acute cholecystitis
时间窗: Within 90 days after intervention
Defined by radiological evidence of cholecystitis associated with fever (axillary temperature \>38°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count \>10,000/mm³).
Acute pancreatitis
时间窗: Within 90 days after intervention
Defined by the presence of at least two of the following criteria: abdominal pain consistent with pancreatitis, elevation of amylase and/or lipase greater than three times the upper limit of normal, or characteristic imaging findings.
Bile leak
时间窗: Within 90 days after intervention
Defined as intra-abdominal bile leakage due to biliary perforation or at the hepatic puncture site, confirmed by imaging.
Hemorrhage
时间窗: Within 90 days after intervention
Defined as clinical or radiological evidence of bleeding requiring blood transfusion or reintervention.
次要结局
- Therapeutic success(Within 30 days after intervention)
- Mortality(Within 90 days after intervention)
- Need for reintervention(Within 30 days after intervention)