MedPath

Accuracy of Different Technologies for Dental Cast Digitization; CBCT Versus Desktop Optical 3D Scanner

Completed
Conditions
Evaluate and Compare the Accuracy of Digital Dental Models Generated From Plaster Casts by Two Different Scanning Techniques
Registration Number
NCT05874947
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the accuracy of digital dental models generated from plaster casts by two different scanning techniques including Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and extraoral Scanner (EOS) .

The comparison between the two techniques is assessed by orthodontic arch space analysis using linear measurements for arch length and width .

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
24
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with maxillary or mandibular complete permanent dentition
  • Partially edentulous patients provided the dentition are complete from the first molar to the first molar.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with fractured teeth, attrition and/or erosion affecting the anatomical points
  • Patients having non-anatomic restorations that may alter cusp anatomy affecting the accuracy of measurements consequently.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Deviation of CBCT and extraoral scanner's measurements from gold standard in arch space analysis.one year

Evaluate and compare the accuracy of digital dental models generated from plaster casts by two different scanning techniques including Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and extraoral Scanner (EOS).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of dentistry ,Cairo University

🇪🇬

Cairo, Almanial, Egypt

Faculty of dentistry ,Cairo University
🇪🇬Cairo, Almanial, Egypt

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.