Comparison of a blood derived product and a dressing processed from animal skin for treatment of receded gums.
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and SurgicalHealth Condition 2: K055- Other periodontal diseases
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/02/040385
- Lead Sponsor
- Centre for Dental Education and Research All India Institute of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
a)systemically healthy individuals
b)Healthy periodontium or demonstrating stable periodontal condition following conventional periodontal therapy
c)Full mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full mouth bleeding score (FMBS) of < 15%
d)No history of previous periodontal surgery at experimental sites
e)Presence of at least two adjacent Cairo RT1 (gingival recession with no loss of interproximal attachment) multiple buccal recessions >= 2 mm on anterior teeth or premolars in both jaws
f)Presence of an identifiable CEJ (a step <=1 mm at CEJ level and/or presence of a root abrasion, but with an identifiable CEJ, will be accepted).
g)Probing depth (PD) <= 3 mm
h)Absence of non-vital, supraerupted or mobile teeth for treatment of GR.
a)Molars and teeth with presence of restorations, caries or crowns in the area to be treated.
b)Gingival recessions presenting minimal amount ( <1 mm) of keratinized tissue (KT) apical to recession area.
c)Pregnant and lactating females
d)Smokers or tobacco usage in any form
e)History of any systemic medication in last 3 months
f)Patients with coagulation disorders
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare and evaluate effectiveness of xenogeneic collagen matrix or platelet rich fibrin with modified coronally advanced flap procedure in terms of <br/ ><br>gingival recession reduction and soft tissue thickness gain after either treatment.Timepoint: 3, 6 months and 1 year
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome using root coverage esthetic score (RES) <br/ ><br>To assess any differences in patient- centered outcome in terms of postsurgical pain till 1 week and dentinal hypersensitivity and aesthetic satisfaction.Timepoint: baseline, 3, 6 months and 1 year