Effectiveness of Pragmatic Shoulder Technique VS Traditional Physical Therapy

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Shoulder Impingement; Shoulder Injuries; Shoulder Capsulitis; Shoulder Pain; Frozen Shoulder
• Interventions: Other: traditional physical therapy; Other: set of pragmatic shoulder technique

• Registration Number: NCT04859387
• Lead Sponsor: Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences

Brief Summary

Isolated and combined effectiveness of pragmatic protocols on shoulder range of motion had been investigated and found effective in healthy participants. To our knowledge, there was insufficient literature to support the comparison between pragmatic and traditional protocols in the treatment of shoulder pathologies.

Detailed Description

Different physical therapy treatments are being used for shoulder pathologies which include modalities (hot pack, TENS), ROM exercises, stretching, strengthening, soft tissue mobilization and set of pragmatic manual techniques.The set of pragmatic manual therapies are novel techniques (comprises of acromioclavicular mobilization, serratus anterior stretch, thoracic manipulation, RC facilitation, and PCS) and its isolated effectiveness on ROM in healthy subjects has been investigated and found effective. These studies recommended the use of a pragmatic protocol for the prevention and rehabilitation of shoulder injuries and pathologies (unpublished data).As per our knowledge there is insufficient literature to support the comparison of the effectiveness of a set of pragmatic protocols with traditional interventions. Our research is proposed to compare the efficacy of pragmatic interventions with that of traditional interventions in patients with shoulder pathology and their effect on the quality of life.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2020-04-15
• Primary Completion: 2020-07-30
• Study Completion: 2020-09-23
• Status Verified: 2021-04
• Study First Submitted: 2021-04-15
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-04-23
• Study First Posted: 2021-04-26
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-05-28
• Last Update Posted: 2021-06-02

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 49

Inclusion Criteria

• Functional movement score 1 and 2 or limitation in Range of motion of Abduction, internal rotation, external rotation, RUBB, and RDBN. All or only one of the limitations in comparison with the unaffected shoulder joint.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with shoulder instability. Functional movement score 3 and 0. Individuals with recent fractures of fewer than 6 weeks duration. Cancerous Growth around the shoulder girdle. Breast cancer and undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy. RA arthritis patients. Long-term use of steroids and severe osteoporosis.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
group B	traditional physical therapy	traditional physical therapy
group A	set of pragmatic shoulder technique	set of pragmatic shoulder techniques

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
shoulder Range of motion	5 days	will be measured in degrees by digital inclinometer
functional movements	5 days	will be measured in centimeters by inchi tape

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Helping hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences Trust; 🇵🇰 Mansehra, KPK, Pakistan