Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04859387
NCT04859387CompletedNot Applicable

Effectiveness of Pragmatic Shoulder Techniques in Comparison With Traditional Physical Therapy in Patients With Shoulder Pathologies

Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences1 site in 1 country49 target enrollmentStarted: April 15, 2020Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
49
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
shoulder Range of motion

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Isolated and combined effectiveness of pragmatic protocols on shoulder range of motion had been investigated and found effective in healthy participants. To our knowledge, there was insufficient literature to support the comparison between pragmatic and traditional protocols in the treatment of shoulder pathologies.

Detailed Description

Different physical therapy treatments are being used for shoulder pathologies which include modalities (hot pack, TENS), ROM exercises, stretching, strengthening, soft tissue mobilization and set of pragmatic manual techniques.The set of pragmatic manual therapies are novel techniques (comprises of acromioclavicular mobilization, serratus anterior stretch, thoracic manipulation, RC facilitation, and PCS) and its isolated effectiveness on ROM in healthy subjects has been investigated and found effective. These studies recommended the use of a pragmatic protocol for the prevention and rehabilitation of shoulder injuries and pathologies (unpublished data).As per our knowledge there is insufficient literature to support the comparison of the effectiveness of a set of pragmatic protocols with traditional interventions. Our research is proposed to compare the efficacy of pragmatic interventions with that of traditional interventions in patients with shoulder pathology and their effect on the quality of life.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Functional movement score 1 and 2 or limitation in Range of motion of Abduction, internal rotation, external rotation, RUBB, and RDBN. All or only one of the limitations in comparison with the unaffected shoulder joint.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients with shoulder instability. Functional movement score 3 and
  • •Individuals with recent fractures of fewer than 6 weeks duration. Cancerous Growth around the shoulder girdle. Breast cancer and undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy. RA arthritis patients. Long-term use of steroids and severe osteoporosis.

Arms & Interventions

group A

Experimental

set of pragmatic shoulder techniques

Intervention: set of pragmatic shoulder technique (Other)

group B

Active Comparator

traditional physical therapy

Intervention: traditional physical therapy (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

shoulder Range of motion

Time Frame: 5 days

will be measured in degrees by digital inclinometer

functional movements

Time Frame: 5 days

will be measured in centimeters by inchi tape

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials