Comparative Study to know peri-operative efficacy of ultrasound guided Versus Landmark guided anterior abdominal wall anaesthesia block for patients undergoing Laproscopic removal of Uterus
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: N858- Other specified noninflammatory disorders of uterus
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/06/054344
- Lead Sponsor
- Fortis Escort Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
patients upto the age of 70years
ASA physical status 1 and 2.
patients who are planned for videolaproscopic hysterectomy( no conversion to open)
patients who are willing to participate with valid consent.
Exclusion Criteria
ASA Status more than 2
Allergic and contradiction to the administration of the drugs used in the study
infections and injuries at the puncture sites
BMI 40
Patients with severe neurological or psychiatric disorders
Patients with history of opioid abuse
Oncological Surgery
Substantial hepatic or renal impairment
Long standing diabetes (more than 10 years)
Prolonged Duration of Surgery (more than three hours)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare Landmark guided versus ultrasound guided TAP block efficacy <br/ ><br>Hemodynamic response intra operatively and post operatively. <br/ ><br>Opioid consumptionTimepoint: post operative pain score at 0,2,6,12 and 24 hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Reduced opioid consumption in laproscopic hysterectomy patients intraoperatively and post operatively following TAP BLOCK.Timepoint: To see the vas score post operatively