The Training and Evaluate Effect of Simulation on Clinical Airway Management During Perioperative Period
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 150
- 主要终点
- Change of Time needed.
研究概览
简要总结
In this self-control experiment, anesthesiologists with limited experiments of bronchoscopy working in anesthesiology department in Peking Union Medical College Hospital will receive a training and evaluation procedure in simulation and clinical practice about clinical airway management. The objects was (1) to investigate the improvements of manufacturing bronchoscopy in simulation and clinical practise before and after training on simulation,(2) to record the efforts trainees needed to achieve experienced on simulation, (3) to evaluate if status manufacturing on simulations could reflect the ones in clinical practise.
详细描述
A modified global rating scale from 1 (unskilled) to 5 (expert) with a score of 3 linked to proficiency, and 5-points Likert from 1 (felt extremely unsure) to 5 (felt extremely confidence) with a score of 4 linked to confidence were used to evaluate during the procedure of training and evaluation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 15 Years 至 65 Years（Child, Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •An anesthesiologist who is working on anesthesia airway management；
- •During the research period, he/she worked in the anesthesiology department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital；
- •Have some experience in airway management，Meet at least one of the following conditions: ①Airway management experience ≤10 cases；②Objective GRS score <3 points；③Subjective Likert score <3 points
排除标准
- •Cannot complete pre-training assessment；
- •Cannot complete the training course；
- •Cannot complete the post-training evaluation；
- •Clinical airway managers were not performed during the study period.
研究组 & 干预措施
anesthesiologist with limited experiment
Anesthesiologists with limited experiment of bronchoscopy.
干预措施: anesthesiologist with limited experiment (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Change of Time needed.
时间窗: Changes from baseline after finishing simulate training, an average of 1 month.
Change of time needed to navigate using bronchoscopy.
Change of modified global rating scores (GRS).
时间窗: Changes from baseline after finishing simulate training, an average of 1 month.
Change of modified global rating scores (GRS) rating manufacturing skills using bronchoscopy. Total score ranges from 4 to 20 scores at 1-score intervals, higher score matches better skill. Total score is the submission of four subscales, which evaluating central view, mucosal contact, progress and orientation using bronchoscopy, ranges from 1 to 5 scores at 1-score interval, higher scores represent better outcome.
Change of Likert score.
时间窗: Changes from baseline after finishing simulate training, an average of 1 month.
Change of Likert score evaluating self-confidence using bronchoscopy. Likert score ranges from 1 to 5 scores at 1-score intervals, higher score with more self-confidence.
次要结局
- Inconsistency of evaluation of time needed between simulate and clinical practice.(At the beginning and after finishing the training, an average of 1 month.)
- Inconsistency of evaluation of modified global rating scores (GRS) between simulate and clinical practice.(At the beginning and after finishing the training, an average of 1 month.)
- Inconsistency of evaluation of Likert score between simulate and clinical practice.(At the beginning and after finishing the training, an average of 1 month.)
研究者
Chunhua Yu
Chief Physician
Peking Union Medical College Hospital