Real World Effectiveness, Persistence, Tolerability, and Safety of Ofatumumab in Clinical Practice
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Registration Number
- NCT06737419
- Lead Sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Brief Summary
This was a retrospective cohort study using the electronic medical record (EMR) database from Cleveland Clinic. The data was analyzed at start of ofatumumab (OMB) therapy (baseline, defined as 6 months prior to OMB initiation) and at 6 or 12 months following initiation of OMB.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 175
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Patients Categorized by Number of Relapses Baseline, Month 6, Month 12 Change in Relapse Rate From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 After Initiating OMB Treatment From Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 12
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Patients Categorized by Comorbidity Baseline Number of Patients With no Prior Exposure to Disease Modifying Therapies (DMTs) Baseline Number of Prior DMTs Baseline Number of Patients who Switched From a DMT to OMB Baseline Duration of Time Between Prior DMT and Initiating OMB Treatment Baseline Number of Patients by Most Recent Prior DMT Baseline Most recent previous DMTs (in the last 6 months) included high efficacy and medium/low efficacy DMTs.
Number of Patients who Discontinued DMT Prior to OMB Treatment by Reason for Discontinuation Baseline Number of Patients by Number of New Brain T2 Lesions Baseline, Month 6, Month 12 Number of Patients by Number of New Brain Gadolinium Enhancing (GdE) Lesions Baseline, Month 6, Month 12 Change in Number of New Brain T2 Lesions From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 After Initiating OMB Treatment From Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 12 Change in Number of New Brain GdE Lesions From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 After Initiating OMB Treatment From Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 12 Mean Duration of Disease Baseline Number of Patients by Most Recent Disease Course Baseline Most recent disease course (in the last 6 months) included relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS)/clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and primary progressive MS (PPMS).
Number of Patients by Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) Score Baseline, Month 6, Month 12 The PDDS is a standardized rating scale which is a self-assessment scale of functional disability in MS patients primarily based on ambulation. The questionnaire contained 1 question which was scored ranging from 0 = Normal; 1 = Mild disability; 2 = Moderate disability; 3 = Gait disability; 4 = Early cane; 5 = Late cane; 6 = Bilateral support; and 7 = Wheelchair bound.
Age Baseline Number of Patients per Demographic Category Baseline Demographics included:
* Gender
* Race
* EthnicityChange in PDDS Scores From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 After Initiating OMB Treatment From Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 12 The PDDS is a standardized rating scale which is a self-assessment scale of functional disability in MS patients primarily based on ambulation. The questionnaire contained 1 question which was scored ranging from 0 = Normal; 1 = Mild disability; 2 = Moderate disability; 3 = Gait disability; 4 = Early cane; 5 = Late cane; 6 = Bilateral support; and 7 = Wheelchair bound.
Change in Neuro-performance Tests From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 After Initiating OMB Treatment From Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 12 Neuro-performance measures included four assessments, cognitive assessment through the processing speed test (PST), upper extremity motor function through the manual dexterity test (MDT), lower extremity function through the walking speed test (WST), and vision assessment through the contrast sensitivity test (CST). PST and CST were scored based on the number of correct responses (with a higher score representing better performance), while MDT and WST were measured based on time to completion (with a lower score representing better performance).
Change in No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 After Initiating OMB Treatment From Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 12 When available, disability progression measures were calculated for patients. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA-2) status was defined and measured as the absence of clinical relapses and new/enlarging T2 and GdE lesions. NEDA-3 status was defined as components of NEDA-2 and absence of PDDS score worsening. NEDA-2 and NEDA-3 were only evaluated in patients who had all relevant parameters available for review.
Median Change of PDDS From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 After Initiation of OMB Treatment From Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 12 The PDDS is a standardized rating scale which is a self-assessment scale of functional disability in MS patients primarily based on ambulation. The questionnaire contained 1 question which was scored ranging from 0 = Normal; 1 = Mild disability; 2 = Moderate disability; 3 = Gait disability; 4 = Early cane; 5 = Late cane; 6 = Bilateral support; and 7 = Wheelchair bound.
Number of Patients With 20% or Greater Worsening of Neuro-performance Test Scores After Initiating OMB Treatment Month 6 and Month 12 Neuro-performance measures included four assessments, cognitive assessment through the processing speed test (PST), upper extremity motor function through the manual dexterity test (MDT), lower extremity function through the walking speed test (WST), and vision assessment through the contrast sensitivity test (CST). PST and CST were scored based on the number of correct responses (with a higher score representing better performance), while MDT and WST were measured based on time to completion (with a lower score representing better performance).
Number of Patients With 20% or Greater Worsening of PDDS Scores After Initiating OMB Treatment Month 6 and Month 12 The PDDS is a standardized rating scale which is a self-assessment scale of functional disability in MS patients primarily based on ambulation. The questionnaire contained 1 question which was scored ranging from 0 = Normal; 1 = Mild disability; 2 = Moderate disability; 3 = Gait disability; 4 = Early cane; 5 = Late cane; 6 = Bilateral support; and 7 = Wheelchair bound.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Novartis
🇺🇸East Hanover, New Jersey, United States