Evaluation of the Making Proud Choices! Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program
- Conditions
- Teen Pregnancy Prevention
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Making Proud ChoicesBehavioral: Business as usual
- Registration Number
- NCT04863326
- Lead Sponsor
- Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
- Brief Summary
Under contract to the Office of Population Affairs (OPA), Mathematica is conducting an impact study of the Making Proud Choices! (MPC) teen pregnancy prevention program. The impact study is designed to estimate the impact of MPC, compared to the business-as-usual condition, on risk and protective factors, sexual behaviors, and longer term health goals including pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections.
- Detailed Description
This evaluation used a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) design to assess the effectiveness of MPC, with schools within districts randomly assigned to one of two conditions: (1) MPC implemented by health educators, or (2) business as usual. In total, 31 school clusters were randomly assigned to condition, including roughly 2800 students, in four geographic areas across the U.S.
The study was implemented over the course of three school years (2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19), with youth in each year considered a separate evaluation cohort, and with participating schools (and new cohorts of eligible youth) randomized to condition each year.
There are two main sources of data for this study: outcome and implementation data. Youth in the study completed two waves of self-report surveys: (1) a baseline survey administered before programming began, and (2) a follow-up outcome survey administered approximately six months after the end of programming (approximately 9 months after baseline, on average). The surveys measured antecedents to sexual behavior (risk and protective factors), sexual behaviors, and ultimately, MPC's health goals of reducing sexually transmitted infections and teen pregnancies. Program implementation data included fidelity and attendance logs, observations, interviews, study youth focus groups, staff surveys, and technical assistance logs.
The benchmark analytic approach for estimating program impacts focuses on individuals with observed (non-missing) outcome data, and will statistically adjust for several baseline and location variables to produce credible and precise estimates of program effectiveness. Several sensitivity analyses will be conducted to understand the robustness of the findings across alternative specifications, and to understand the effect of MPC across a variety of subgroups.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 2810
- Enrolled in a study school
- Attending the targeted class (e.g. health class) for the first time
- None
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Making Proud Choices Making Proud Choices This evaluation tests the effect of the MPC School Edition, the version of the MPC 5th Edition designed for implementation in school. This edition includes 9.5 hours of content implemented in 14 40-minute modules. Schools assigned to the MPC condition received MPC in a targeted class. Business as usual Business as usual The control group continued with their regular programming in the targeted class, which was often a health or Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) class.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ever any sex (vaginal, oral, or anal) Survey administered 6 months post program Binary variable representing if the respondent reported having ever had vaginal, oral, or anal sex.
Any sex (in past 3 months) Survey administered 6 months post program Binary variable representing if the respondent reported having vaginal, oral, or anal sex in the three month period before completing the follow-up survey.
Times having any sex (in past 3 months) Survey administered 6 months post program Count variable representing the total number of times respondent had vaginal, oral and/or anal sex in the three month period before completing the follow-up survey.
Count of vaginal sex partners (in the past 3 months) Survey administered 6 months post program Count variable representing the number of partners for vaginal sex in the three month period before completing the follow-up survey.
Any sex without a condom (in past 3 months) Survey administered 6 months post program Binary variable representing if respondent reported having any risk for STD/STI sex (sex without a condom) in the three month period before completing the follow-up survey.
Times having any sex without a condom in past 3 months Survey administered 6 months post program Count variable representing the total number of times respondent had risky sex in the three months before completing follow-up survey.
Sex without birth control in past 3 months Survey administered 6 months post program Binary variable representing if respondent reported having had unprotected vaginal sex in the three months before completing the follow-up survey.
Times having sex without birth control (in past 3 months) Survey administered 6 months post program Count variable representing the total number of times the respondent had unprotected vaginal sex in the three month period before completing the follow-up survey.
Ever pregnant Survey administered 6 months post program Binary variable representing if the respondent reported a pregnancy or has gotten someone pregnant.
Any sexually transmitted infection (STI) Survey administered 6 months post program Binary variable representing if the respondent indicated having been told they have a sexually transmitted infection.
Knowledge about HIV Survey administered 6 months post program Proportion of knowledge items about HIV/STDs answered correctly.
Knowledge about condoms Survey administered 6 months post program Proportion of knowledge items about condom use answered correctly.
Knowledge about other forms of contraception Survey administered 6 months post program Proportion of knowledge items about contraceptive use answered correctly.
Belief that sex may adversely affect future goals Survey administered 6 months post program Proportion of statements about how sexual activity will interfere with goals and dreams that the respondent agrees or strongly agrees with.
Belief that condoms can be pleasurable Survey administered 6 months post program Proportion of statements about how condoms can be pleasurable that the respondent agrees or strongly agrees with.
Attitudes about condoms Survey administered 6 months post program Proportion of statements about condom use that the respondent either agrees or strongly agrees with.
Condom self-efficacy Survey administered 6 months post program Proportion of statements about self-efficacy using condoms that the respondent agrees or strongly agrees with.
Condom negotiation Survey administered 6 months post program Proportion of statements about self-efficacy negotiating condom that the respondent agrees or strongly agrees with.
Refusal skills Survey administered 6 months post program Proportion of statements about self-efficacy refusing sex with a partner that the respondent agrees or strongly agrees with.
Knowledge about pregnancy Survey administered 6 months post program Proportion of knowledge items about pregnancy answered correctly.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method