Clinical Evaluation of Giomer Based Injectable Resin Composite Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Carious Cavities Over 18-months.
- Conditions
- Class V Dental Caries
- Interventions
- Device: Resin modified glass ionomerDevice: Giomer based injectable resin composite
- Registration Number
- NCT05389163
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
Class V carious lesions will be restored using either Resin modified glass ionomer or Giomer based injectable resin composite.The restorations will be evaluated at baseline and regular recalls of 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months, using modified United States Public Health Service criteria.
- Detailed Description
In this study, Class V carious lesions will be restored using two different restorative materials either Resin modified glass ionomer or Giomer based injectable resin composite. Patients will be assessed for medical and dental histories first. Then an examination of the patients will be done using visual inspection by using a dental mirror and probe. Eligible patients according to inclusion and exclusion criteria will be informed about all procedures with follow up time if they accept. Their signature on written informed consents will be obtained. Eligible participants will be randomly divided into two groups according to the type of restoration they will be received.The first group (A) (Intervention): Giomer based injectable resin composite (Beautifil Flow plus X F03, SHOFU, USA): The material will be applied according to manufacturer instructions. The second group (B) (comparator): Resin modified glass ionomer (Fuji II LC, GC): The material will be applied according to manufacturer instructions.The restorations will be evaluated at baseline and regular recalls of 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months, using modified United States Public Health Service criteria (USPHS) for the following characteristics: retention, anatomical form, marginal adaptation, marginal staining, surface texture, and secondary caries . The restorations will be evaluated with the aid of a dental explorer and an intraoral mirror and visual inspection. The restorations will be scored as follows: Alfa represents the ideal clinical situation, Bravo will be clinically acceptable, and Charlie represents a clinically unacceptable situation.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Resin modified glass ionomer Resin modified glass ionomer Fuji II LC, GC Giomer based injectable resin composite Giomer based injectable resin composite Beautifil Flow plus X F03, SHOFU, USA
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical performance (Marginal adaptation) 18 months Method of measurement is Modified United State Public Health Service Criteria (Modified USPHS) using (Alpha, Bravo, charlie) as unit of measurement by Scoring %.
Alpha is the best outcome and charlie is the worse outcome .
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical performance (Anatomical form, marginal discoloration, Secondary caries, surface texture , Postoperative sensitivity, Retention,) 18 months Method of measurement is Modified United State Public Health Service Criteria (Modified USPHS) using (Alpha, Bravo, charlie) as unit of measurement by Scoring %.
Alpha is the best outcome and charlie worse outcome .
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Cairo University
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt