MedPath

Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion in the Hospitalized Patient: Long vs. Short Axis Placement

Not Applicable
Withdrawn
Conditions
Need for IV Access
Interventions
Device: Long axis IV placement with ultrasound
Device: Short axis IV placement with ultrasound
Registration Number
NCT01870661
Lead Sponsor
Beth Israel Medical Center
Brief Summary

Comparison of peripheral IV catheters inserted by ultrasound using the long axis vs. the short axis technique. Our hypothesis is that long axis ultrasound placement will increase the longevity of the IV catheter.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
WITHDRAWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
  • A patient who needs PIV access for intravenous medications and resuscitation either on a medical-surgical floor or in the ICU
  • After floor team (including RN and/or house staff) and IV Nurse have attempted and failed or is not available
Exclusion Criteria
  • Need for vasopressors
  • Need for TPN
  • Need for hemodynamic monitoring
  • Non English speaking patient
  • Patients who are unable to consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Long axis ultrasound placement of IVLong axis IV placement with ultrasoundLong axis ultrasound placement of IV catheter
Short axis ultrasound placement of IVShort axis IV placement with ultrasoundLong axis ultrasound placement of IV catheter
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
catheter survival3 days

How many catheters survived for 3 days or as long as they are needed.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Need for central venous accessfor 3 days
success rate of peripheral IV using ultrasound assistance30 minutes
Complication rate3 days

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Beth Isreal Medical Center

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath