Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion in the Hospitalized Patient: Long vs. Short Axis Placement
Not Applicable
Withdrawn
- Conditions
- Need for IV Access
- Interventions
- Device: Long axis IV placement with ultrasoundDevice: Short axis IV placement with ultrasound
- Registration Number
- NCT01870661
- Lead Sponsor
- Beth Israel Medical Center
- Brief Summary
Comparison of peripheral IV catheters inserted by ultrasound using the long axis vs. the short axis technique. Our hypothesis is that long axis ultrasound placement will increase the longevity of the IV catheter.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
- A patient who needs PIV access for intravenous medications and resuscitation either on a medical-surgical floor or in the ICU
- After floor team (including RN and/or house staff) and IV Nurse have attempted and failed or is not available
Exclusion Criteria
- Need for vasopressors
- Need for TPN
- Need for hemodynamic monitoring
- Non English speaking patient
- Patients who are unable to consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Long axis ultrasound placement of IV Long axis IV placement with ultrasound Long axis ultrasound placement of IV catheter Short axis ultrasound placement of IV Short axis IV placement with ultrasound Long axis ultrasound placement of IV catheter
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method catheter survival 3 days How many catheters survived for 3 days or as long as they are needed.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Need for central venous access for 3 days success rate of peripheral IV using ultrasound assistance 30 minutes Complication rate 3 days
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Beth Isreal Medical Center
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States