Imaging of Tumour Microenvironment in Patients With Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using RGD PET/CT Imaging
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Enrollment
- 20
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Differences in RGD-tracer uptake between HPV positive and negative tumours
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Known risk factors inducing squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck are tabacco and alcohol intake. However, the incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) related oropharyngeal carcinomas is increasing. It is known that HPV+ and HPV- tumors have a different reaction to (chemo)radiotherapy. The exact mechanisms underlying these differences is not yet known but might be caused by changes in vascularity. Therefore the vasculature is imaged with the help of a study specific Gallium-68-DOTA-(RGD)2 PET/CT scan and a CT perfusion scan.
Detailed Description
The incidence of Human Papilloma Virus positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is rising and it has become evident that this type of cancer represents a subgroup of HNSCC that is characterized by a more favourable prognosis, mediated by a distinct tumour microenvironment, compared to patients with HPV negative (HPV-) tumours. However, the exact mechanisms underlying this improved treatment outcome and the potential role of the tumour microenvironment are not fully understood yet. Imaging of αvβ3 integrin expression will obtain more insight in the differences in tumour microenvironment between HPV+ and HPV- oropharyngeal HNSCC. CT perfusion provides additional characterisation of this tumour microenvironment. Therefore, these techniques may have the potential to predict response to treatment and might possibly steer treatment decisions in future clinical trials.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx
- •p-16 immunohistochemistry analysis
- •Tumour lesion of at least 1.0 cm in diameter
- •Planned chemoradiotherapy as primary treatment
- •Ability to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- •Contra-indications for PET
- •Contra-indications for administration of iodine-containing contrast agents
- •Other serious illness that can affect the scans
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Differences in RGD-tracer uptake between HPV positive and negative tumours
Time Frame: 1 month
standardized uptake values (SUV) of Ga68-RGD
Differences in RGD-tracer uptake between the pre- and per-treatment scan
Time Frame: 1 month
standardized uptake values (SUV) of Ga68-RGD
Differences in CT perfusion flow parameters between HPV positive and negative tumours
Time Frame: 1 month
Determining the blood flow using ROIs of the tumour drawn on the contrast enhanced CT
Differences in CT perfusion parameters between HPV positive and negative tumours
Time Frame: 1 month
Determining the blood volume using ROIs of the tumour drawn on the contrast enhanced CT
Differences in CT perfusion flow parameters between the pre- and per-treatment scan
Time Frame: 1 month
Determining the blood flow using ROIs of the tumour drawn on the contrast enhanced CT
Differences in CT perfusion parameters between the pre- and per-treatment scan
Time Frame: 1 month
Determining the blood volume using ROIs of the tumour drawn on the contrast enhanced CT
Secondary Outcomes
- Differences in RGD-tracer uptake between patients with locoregional control or recurrence within one year(1 year)
- Differences in CT perfusion parameters between patients with locoregional control or recurrence within one year(1 year)
- Differences in CT perfusion flow parameters between patients with locoregional control or recurrence within one year(1 year)