Risk Scoring Systems in Upper GI-haemorrhage
- Conditions
- Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
- Registration Number
- NCT01589250
- Lead Sponsor
- Odense University Hospital
- Brief Summary
Use of risk scoring systems in the assessment of patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage is increasing. Comparative studies have intended to identify the system of choice, but the majority of these are characterized by retrospective designs, small sample sizes, low rate of severe bleeding, or low mortality. The main aim of this study was to identify the optimal scoring system.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 831
One of the following:
- Haematemesis
- Melaena
- Coffee-ground vomit
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Need for hospital-based intervention 1 month Need of hospital-based intervention was defined as treatment with blood transfusion, endoscopic therapy, transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE), surgery, or identification of cancer at upper endoscopy.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Identification of low-risk patients 1 month Low-risk patients were defined as patients who did not need hospital-based intervention, and survived more than 30 days from day of admission. Low-risk patients were considered as suitable for early discharge and potential outpatient management.
Rebleeding 1 month Rebleeding was defined as presence of hematemesis, blood per nasogastric tube, or melaena associated with a decline in B-hemoglobin of at least 1mmol/l (not explained by hemodilution) or decline in systolic arterial pressure of at least 20mmHg after the initial bleeding had stopped.
30 day mortality 30 days
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Odense University Hospital
🇩🇰Odense, Denmark