MedPath

Risk Scoring Systems in Upper GI-haemorrhage

Completed
Conditions
Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
Registration Number
NCT01589250
Lead Sponsor
Odense University Hospital
Brief Summary

Use of risk scoring systems in the assessment of patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage is increasing. Comparative studies have intended to identify the system of choice, but the majority of these are characterized by retrospective designs, small sample sizes, low rate of severe bleeding, or low mortality. The main aim of this study was to identify the optimal scoring system.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
831
Inclusion Criteria

One of the following:

  • Haematemesis
  • Melaena
  • Coffee-ground vomit
Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Need for hospital-based intervention1 month

Need of hospital-based intervention was defined as treatment with blood transfusion, endoscopic therapy, transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE), surgery, or identification of cancer at upper endoscopy.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Identification of low-risk patients1 month

Low-risk patients were defined as patients who did not need hospital-based intervention, and survived more than 30 days from day of admission. Low-risk patients were considered as suitable for early discharge and potential outpatient management.

Rebleeding1 month

Rebleeding was defined as presence of hematemesis, blood per nasogastric tube, or melaena associated with a decline in B-hemoglobin of at least 1mmol/l (not explained by hemodilution) or decline in systolic arterial pressure of at least 20mmHg after the initial bleeding had stopped.

30 day mortality30 days

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Odense University Hospital

🇩🇰

Odense, Denmark

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath