Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06487988
NCT06487988CompletedNot Applicable

Asleep Fiberoptic vs Direct Laryngoscopy Effect on Hemodynamic Stability Using Opioid Free Anesthesia Induction

American University of Beirut Medical Center2 sites in 1 country68 target enrollmentStarted: September 11, 2024Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
68
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Heart rate

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare blood pressure and heart rate between the fiberoptic and direct oral intubation using opioid free anesthesia induction. Secondary objectives include comparing the time needed for intubation and the incidence of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and upper airway trauma in adults aging between 18 to 55 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Does fiberoptic intubation cause less hemodynamic instability than direct oral intubation using opioid free anesthesia induction?

Detailed Description

Background: Intubation has always been linked to a transient increase in blood pressure and heart rate that could be deleterious in elderly and hemodynamically unstable patients. Fiberoptic intubation, which is currently used for suspected difficult intubation, could cause less marked rise in blood pressure and heart rate. Furthermore, "opioid free anesthesia" has gained popularity lately to avoid opioid adverse effects ranging from respiratory depression, postoperative ileus, sedation, nausea, vomiting and urinary retention.

Specific aims: The primary objective of this study is to compare blood pressure and heart rate between the fiberoptic and direct oral intubation using opioid free anesthesia induction. Secondary objectives include comparing the time needed for intubation and the incidence of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and upper airway trauma.

Methods: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, 90 (45 in each group) adults aging between 18 to 55 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia, will be recruited over 1 year of work. Patients will be randomly allocated to 2 groups: The direct conventional laryngoscopy group performed with N3 (for females) or N4 (for males) Macintosh laryngoscope blade, and the fiberoptic guided intubation group.

Significance: Studies comparing hemodynamic stability using fiberoptic intubation versus direct oral intubation in opioid free anesthesia are limited. The present study will assess whether fiberoptic intubation causes less hemodynamic instability than direct oral intubation in opioid free anesthesia induction, which will benefit patients with normal airways.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 55 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I and II
  • •Range age of 18-55 years' old
  • •Scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •History of cardiovascular diseases.
  • •History of lung disease.
  • •Hypertensive patient (BP> 140/90)
  • •Patient taking medications that affect blood pressure and heart rate
  • •Morbid obesity (BMI >30)
  • •Severe GERD
  • •Predicted difficult airway (Short TMD <6 cm, Upper li bite test grade III, Mallampati score
  • •Neck instability
  • •Patient planned to receive rapid sequence intubation
  • •Patient refusal to participate
  • •History of difficult intubation/ ventilation

Arms & Interventions

The direct conventional laryngoscopy group

Active Comparator

The direct conventional laryngoscopy group will be performed with N3 (for females) or N4 (for males) Macintosh laryngoscope blade.

Intervention: direct conventional laryngoscopy (Device)

The fiberoptic guided intubation group

Experimental

The fiberoptic guided intubation will be performed.

Intervention: fiberoptic guided intubation (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Heart rate

Time Frame: baseline and up to 5 mins upon intubation

Heart rate (bpm)

Blood pressure

Time Frame: baseline and up to 5 mins upon intubation

Blood pressure (mm Hg)

Secondary Outcomes

  • incidence of postoperative sore throat(after 24 hrs)
  • incidence of upper airway trauma(during intubation)
  • time needed for intubation(between face mask removal and first ETCO2 reading in minutes)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Christian Rouphael

Clinical Instructor of Anesthesia

American University of Beirut Medical Center

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Asleep Fiberoptic vs Direct Laryngoscopy... | Clinical Trial