Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07349355
NCT07349355Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

The Effect of In-Situ Simulation and Standardized Patient Practice on Medical Error Tendencies and Attitudes of Senior Nursing Students

Selçuk Görücü1 site in 1 country81 target enrollmentStarted: January 15, 2026Last updated:
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
81
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Medical error tendency scale scores of final-year nursing students

Study Overview

Brief Summary

As the professional group that has the most frequent contact with patients, nurses are critical to the sustainability of safe care. Literature demonstrates that nursing practice is prone to error due to heavy workloads, time pressures, complex clinical tasks, inadequate rest, inappropriate working conditions, and the physiological strain of demanding shifts. When these conditions strain both physical and cognitive resources, the risk of errors during treatment administration increases.

Medical errors remain one of the most devastating realities of healthcare. Data from the World Health Organization reveals the significant morbidity and mortality caused by errors on a global scale. Numerous studies have demonstrated that student nurses have a significant rate of errors, and those with limited clinical experience are particularly at risk in fundamental areas such as medication administration, asepsis, and patient identification. Increasing patient numbers, short stays, rapid turnover, and the intense pace of clinics negatively impact student nurses' ability to provide safe care, prompting both educators and students to seek stronger pedagogical solutions.

This is where simulation-based training comes into play. Simulation is emerging as a contemporary teaching approach that enables students to develop their clinical skills, communication, decision-making, and self-efficacy in a risk-free, safe, and structured environment. It is increasingly being used because it supports knowledge and skill transfer, reduces fear and anxiety, strengthens self-confidence, and provides the opportunity to experience errors. In-situ simulation and standardized patient practice offer strong potential for reducing students' error proneness by providing an experience closest to real-world clinical situations. However, the lack of a study in the literature examining the effects of these two methods, particularly on the medical error proneness and attitudes of final-year nursing students, is a significant gap.

This study aims to strengthen a critical area of nursing education. The aim is to evaluate the impact of in-situ simulation and standardized patient practice on final-year nursing students' medical error proneness and attitudes toward medical errors and to reveal how they transform students' competencies in providing safe care.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Students were included in the study if they were:
  • A senior nursing student at Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Nursing
  • Volunteering to participate in the study
  • Not absent at any time during the study period
  • Working/not working as a nurse

Exclusion Criteria

  • Graduated from a health vocational high school
  • Admitted through the Foreign Student Exam (YÖS)
  • Graduated from a health-related associate's degree program and then enrolled in the nursing department through the Vertical Transfer Exam (DGS)
  • Students who did not wish to participate in the study were excluded from the study.

Arms & Interventions

Group 1

Experimental

Group 1 receives training in a simulation laboratory environment using standard patient interventions.

Intervention: Standardized patient (Other)

Group 2

Experimental

Group 2 receives training in a real hospital setting through on-site simulations and standardized patient interventions.

Intervention: İn-situ simulation (Other)

Group 3

No Intervention

Group 3 is the control group. They receive traditional classroom-based theoretical instruction.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Medical error tendency scale scores of final-year nursing students

Time Frame: From registration to week 8 of intervention

Medical Error Tendency Scale The minimum possible score is 1, and the maximum is 5. While the scale does not have a cutoff point, an increase in the mean score indicates a low tendency for the nurse to make medical errors, while a decrease in the mean score indicates a high tendency to make errors.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Medical error attitude scale scores of final year nursing students(From registration to week 8 of intervention)

Investigators

Sponsor
Selçuk Görücü
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Selçuk Görücü

Lecturer

Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Simulation Practices and Medical Error... | Clinical Trial