Comparison of two different crowns for functional rehabilitation in childre
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: 2- Placement
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/07/020237
- Lead Sponsor
- Sruthi S
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Healthy Children with no history of any systemic illness or any developmental disease
Minimal of two surfaces of caries in the targeted tooth
Patient with Early Childhood Caries as defined by American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) 2016
Cooperative patient who had behavioral rating positive or definitely positive followed the Frankl behavior classification scale. (Frankl et al. 1962)
Opposing teeth present
Written consent was obtained from the parent/guardian after explaining the full details of the treatment procedure and its possible outcomes, discomfort, risks, and benefits
No patient was excluded on the basis of gender, race, social or economic background
Teeth with proximity to exfoliation and resorption of the root passed its half
Patients with allergy or hypersensitivity to nickel
Presence of single surface caries not involving the proximal surfaces
Teeth that has been subjected to trauma
Children with special needs
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical Outcome <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Oral hygiene index <br/ ><br>Gingival index <br/ ><br>Marginal adaptation <br/ ><br>Surface roughness <br/ ><br>Tooth wear index <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Radiographic outcome <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Interproximal bone level <br/ ><br>Surface margin <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 3 months <br/ ><br>6 months <br/ ><br>12 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ilTimepoint: Nil