Comparison between internal limiting membrane inverted flap and graft techniques for idiopathic large macular holes
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Eye DiseasesMacular hole
- Registration Number
- PACTR201712002858314
- Lead Sponsor
- Authors
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Inclusion Criteria
eyes with large idiopathic macular hole
> 18 years
Exclusion Criteria
complications during surgery
lost of follow up
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie idiopathic large macular hole formation and progression in ophthalmology?
How does internal limiting membrane inverted flap technique compare to graft techniques in treating idiopathic large macular holes?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict successful outcomes for macular hole surgery using ILM techniques?
What are the potential adverse events associated with internal limiting membrane procedures for macular holes?
What combination therapies or alternative surgical approaches are being explored for idiopathic large macular holes?