跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03652285
NCT03652285已完成不适用

Universal Partially Covered Removable Self-Expanding Stent and Anchoring System for the Treatment of Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures (UAS-RBS): a Safety Study

Erasme University Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 11 人开始时间: 2018年3月27日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
11
试验地点
2
主要终点
Technical stent placement success

研究概览

简要总结

A novel stent, called Universal Partially Covered Removable Self-expanding Stent and Anchoring System for the Treatment of Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures (UAS-RBS) was designed to improve the treatment of benign esophageal refractory strictures with a novel stent. This study aims at evaluating the safety of this new device.

详细描述

Refractory strictures are defined as benign esophageal strictures who do not achieve acceptable symptom relief despite an intensive dilation schedule. Considering the failure of balloon or mechanical dilation other techniques such as intralesional injection of corticosteroids or stents placement were developed.

Self-expandable metal stents, plastic stents and biodegradable stents are also used in that indication. In a meta-analysis of 18 studies with 444 patients, clinical success was achieved in 41 percent of patients. Stent migration occurred in 29 percent of patients, and adverse events occurred in 21 percent.

A self-expending nitinol stent has been design to reduce the migration risk. The stent is partially covered on both extremities, allowing the formation of small hyperplasia in the middle part of the stent. This design with the inner sheet (usually, when using fully covered stents, the sheet is outside) allows formation of hyperplasia (therefore reducing the risk of migration) but partly controlled by the inner sheet to reduce the risk of lumen occlusion. By this design, the balance between hyperplasia formation to avoid the risk of migration and reducing the risk of lumen occlusion could be entailed stable esophageal calibration.

The UAS-RBS system is a reversible procedure to treat Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures through stent implantation. Above standard of care monitoring, safety assessment of the procedure and device performance decreases the risk and unforeseen events.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Benign Esophageal Refractory Stricture no more than 40 mm in length.
  • More than two dilations to at least 16 mm in diameter with symptoms relapse within 6 months.
  • Last dilation to 16 mm no more than 6 months before study procedure.
  • Dysphagia score of 2 (ability to swallow semi-solid foods), 3 (ability to swallow liquids only) or 4 (unable to swallow liquids) at the time of measurement.
  • Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study.

排除标准

  • Stricture within 2 cm of the upper esophageal sphincter.
  • Dysphagia related to motility disorder.
  • Planned adjuvant radiation therapy post esophagectomy.
  • Esophageal stent in place.
  • Active erosive esophagitis.
  • Sensitivity to any components of the stent or delivery system.
  • Concurrent medical condition that would affect the investigator's ability to evaluate the patient's condition or could compromise patient safety.
  • Currently enrolled in another clinical trial.

结局指标

主要结局

Technical stent placement success

时间窗: Day 0

Ability to deploy the UAS-RBS in satisfactory position across the stricture

Full deployment of stent

时间窗: Day 0

Endoscopic visualization

Incidence of all Adverse Device Effects

时间窗: 6 months

Serious adverse event (SAE) during the period of stent implantation

Technical stent removal success

时间窗: up to 6 months

Ability to remove the stent without complications

次要结局

  • SAE during the period after stent removal(6 months post retrieval)
  • Number of re-interventions(within 12 months following stent placement)
  • Change of dysphagia score (Dakkak and Bennett score of Dysphagia)(Baseline and at week 1, month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 after implantation)
  • Patient's satisfaction with the therapy(week 1, month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 after implantation)
  • Patient's report of pain(before treatment, and at week 1, month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 after implantation)
  • Quality Of Life SF36 questionnaire(before treatment, and at week 1, month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 after implantation)

研究者

发起方
Erasme University Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验