Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07310082
NCT07310082Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Allograft vs. Autograft to Improve Timely Return to Duty Following Nonunion

Wake Forest University Health Sciences2 sites in 1 country156 target enrollmentStarted: October 1, 2026Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
156
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Metabolic Equivalent for Tasks Score

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research study is to find out if patients treated for nonunion fracture with autograft or allograft return to activity faster.

Detailed Description

The goal of this multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare short and long-term outcomes of adult patients with long-bone nonunion treated with autograft versus allograft. The main question it aims to answer is: will patients who receive an allograft return to work faster than patients who receive an autograft to treat nonunion fracture.

Participants will be randomized to one of two treatment groups and will complete follow-up surveys during their recovery.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients 18 years or older
  • •Long bone (tibia, femur, and humerus) nonunion appropriate for either study treatment: to be treated with bone graft harvested from a remote site or using reamer harvester (RIA)
  • •Nonunion surgery to be performed at least five months after initial fracture fixation
  • •Prior operative fixation of fracture
  • •Radiographic apparent bone gap (RABG) of >5cm

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patient that speaks neither English nor Spanish
  • •Patients whose treatment plan includes local autograft only (available callus from the nonunion site or no planned bone graft)
  • •Known active infection (defined as any clinical signs or symptoms of active infection, such as fevers, wound redness, warmth, swelling, induration or drainage, and abnormal while blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or C-reactive protein) being treated with antibiotics
  • •Body mass index greater than 50
  • •Patients unlikely to follow-up due to homelessness, or planning follow-up at another institution

Arms & Interventions

Allograft

Active Comparator

Patients randomized to allograft.

Intervention: Allograft (Procedure)

Autograft

Active Comparator

Patients randomized to autograft

Intervention: Autograft (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Metabolic Equivalent for Tasks Score

Time Frame: Week 6

Time to return to work/duty will be measured using the the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).The IPAQ is a validated, self-report measure that captures detailed information about participation in a wide range of physical activities, including the number of days and amount of time spent in the previous 7 days. Responses for each type of physical activity are then transformed into the number of Metabolic Equivalent for Tasks (METs), and a METs/week is calculated for each patient.

Metabolic Equivalent for Tasks Score

Time Frame: Month 3

Time to return to work/duty will be measured using the the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).The IPAQ is a validated, self-report measure that captures detailed information about participation in a wide range of physical activities, including the number of days and amount of time spent in the previous 7 days. Responses for each type of physical activity are then transformed into the number of Metabolic Equivalent for Tasks (METs), and a METs/week is calculated for each patient.

Metabolic Equivalent for Tasks Score

Time Frame: Month 6

Time to return to work/duty will be measured using the the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).The IPAQ is a validated, self-report measure that captures detailed information about participation in a wide range of physical activities, including the number of days and amount of time spent in the previous 7 days. Responses for each type of physical activity are then transformed into the number of Metabolic Equivalent for Tasks (METs), and a METs/week is calculated for each patient.

Average Time to Return to Work/Duty

Time Frame: Week 6

Average number of days it takes for participants to return to work/duty

Average Time to Return to Work/Duty

Time Frame: Month 3

Average number of days it takes for participants to return to work/duty

Average Time to Return to Work/Duty

Time Frame: Month 6

Average number of days it takes for participants to return to work/duty

Number of Participants Returned to Work

Time Frame: Week 6

Determined by asking whether subjects have returned to work

Number of Participants Returned to Work

Time Frame: Month 3

Determined by asking whether subjects have returned to work

Number of Participants Returned to Work

Time Frame: Month 6

Determined by asking whether subjects have returned to work

Metabolic Equivalent for Tasks Score

Time Frame: Month 12

Time to return to work/duty will be measured using the the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).The IPAQ is a validated, self-report measure that captures detailed information about participation in a wide range of physical activities, including the number of days and amount of time spent in the previous 7 days. Responses for each type of physical activity are then transformed into the number of Metabolic Equivalent for Tasks (METs), and a METs/week is calculated for each patient.

Metabolic Equivalent for Tasks Score

Time Frame: Month 12

Time to return to work/duty will be measured using the the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).The IPAQ is a validated, self-report measure that captures detailed information about participation in a wide range of physical activities, including the number of days and amount of time spent in the previous 7 days. Responses for each type of physical activity are then transformed into the number of Metabolic Equivalent for Tasks (METs), and a METs/week is calculated for each patient.

Average Time to Return to Work/Duty

Time Frame: Month 12

Average number of days it takes for participants to return to work/duty

Number of Participants Returned to Work

Time Frame: Month 12

Determined by asking whether subjects have returned to work

Secondary Outcomes

  • Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fractures (RUST) score(Month 12)
  • Number of Participants who Return to the Operating Room(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • PROMIS-29 Subscale - Physical Function(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • PROMIS-29 Subscale - Anxiety(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • PROMIS-29 Subscale - Depression(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • PROMIS-29 Subscale - Fatigue(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • PROMIS-29 Subscale - Sleep Disturbance(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • PROMIS-29 Subscale - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • Number of Resource Utilizations(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • Pain Intensity Scores(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) Scores(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire Scores(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • Number of Complications(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • Time to Union(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • PROMIS-29 Subscale - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • Number of Resource Utilizations(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • Pain Intensity Scores(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) Scores(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire Scores(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • Percentage of Union(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fractures (RUST) score(Month 12)
  • Number of Participants who Return to the Operating Room(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • PROMIS-29 Subscale - Pain Interference(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • PROMIS-29 Subscale - Physical Function(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • PROMIS-29 Subscale - Anxiety(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • PROMIS-29 Subscale - Depression(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • PROMIS-29 Subscale - Fatigue(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • PROMIS-29 Subscale - Sleep Disturbance(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)
  • Number of Complications(Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials