Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Children With a Previous Urinary Tract Infection
- Conditions
- Urinary Tract Infections
- Registration Number
- NCT00156546
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Padova
- Brief Summary
Our hypothesis is that long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis does not reduce the recurrence of infection and the risk of appearance of kidney scars in children with a documented previous upper UTI.
- Detailed Description
Background
Upper urinary tract infections (UTI) are common in children, especially when functional and anatomical abnormalities of the urinary tract co-exist, such as vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR), urinary tract obstruction uropathy and bladder dysfunction. They are associated with the risk of long-term complications, including permanent renal damage (renal scarring), which occurs in 15% of cases. The objective of the diagnosis and medical treatment of UTI in children is the prevention of such complications. Medical treatment includes long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis to be continued for periods ranging from 6 months to 2 years. Recent studies have revealed the emergence of therapy-induced resistance. A review of the literature has highlighted the lack of properly designed, large clinical trials, demonstrating the efficacy of long-term low-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis in terms of reduction in UTI recurrence.
Methods and design
The study is a controlled, randomised, open-label, 3-armed, parallel-group clinical trial comparing no prophylaxis (group 1) with prophylaxis with co-trimoxazole 15 mg/kg daily (group 2) and with amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 15 mg/kg daily (group 3) for 12 months.
Assuming that the incidence of recurrences is 20%, defining efficacy as an incidence of 10% per group and setting error = 0.05 and power = 90%, 220 patients per group (i.e. a total of 660 patients) are required The study population will consist of children aged between 2 months and 6 years, with normal renal function (creatinine clearance 70 ml/min/1.73m2) and a first episode of documented UTI, who presents at least one of the following: an acute pyelonephritic lesion at the DMSA scan and/or a VUR at the baseline micturating cystography.
Patients will be followed-up for 12 months. Urinalysis and urine cultures will be performed every month and clinical examinations after 6 and 12 months; both will be performed whenever UTI is suspected. Sonography, Doppler sonography (optional) and DMSA scintigraphy will be performed at baseline and at the end of the study.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 660
- Age between 2 months and 6 years
- Creatinine clearance (calculated according to Schwartz) 70 ml/min/1.73 m2 (for children in their first year of life, serum creatinine levels within normal range for age and sex)
- First documented upper UTI (diagnostic criteria in Table 1)
- Imaging Diagnostic work-up completed (Table 2) with at least the presence of an acute lesion at the DMSA scan and or a primary non severe reflux ( 1st or 3rd degree)
- Informed consent of parents
- Patients with chronic renal insufficiency or 30% relative function of one kidney at DMSA scan
- Patients with urinary tract disorders, such as vesico-ureteral reflux due to complex malformations of the urinary tract, obstruction of the posterior urethra, ureterocele or single kidney, neurogenic bladder
- Patients with reflux 4th degree
- Patients with pyelonephritis that developed during prophylaxis instituted because of prenatal diagnosis of urinary tract dilatation Hypersensitivity to one of the two selected antimicrobial agents
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The primary end-point is UTI Recurrence Rate during the 12-month observation period and the Development of renal damage (parenchymal scar) after 12 months.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The secondary objectives are the comparison, in terms of efficacy and effectiveness, between two antimicrobial agents that are currently approved for prophylactic use: co-trimoxazole 15 mg/kg daily versus amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 15 mg/kg daily.
Trial Locations
- Locations (16)
Nephrology, Dialysis and transplant Unit Pediatric Depatment,
🇮🇹Padova, Italy
Pediatric Unit, Ospedale di Soave
🇮🇹Soave, Verona, Italy
Pediatric Unit, Ospedale di Castelfranco
🇮🇹Castelfranco Veneto, Treviso, Italy
Pediatric Unit, Ospedale di Motta di Livenza
🇮🇹Motta di Livenza Oderzo, Treviso, Italy
Pediatric Unit, Ospedale di Schio/Thiene
🇮🇹Thiene, Vicenza, Italy
Pediatric Unit, Ospedale di Este - Monselice
🇮🇹Monselice, Padova, Italy
Pediatric Unit, Ospedale di Piove di Sacco e Chioggia
🇮🇹Piove di Sacco, Padova, Italy
Pediatric Unit, Ospedale di Belluno
🇮🇹Belluno, Italy
Pediatric Unit, Ospedale di Mestre
🇮🇹Mestre Venezia, Italy
Pediatric Department, Ospedale Maggiore
🇮🇹Bologna, Italy
- Pediatric Department, Ospedale di Bolzano
🇮🇹Bolzano, Italy
Pediatric Unit, Ospedale di Cuneo
🇮🇹Cuneo, Italy
Pediatric Unit, Ospedale di Bentivoglio
🇮🇹Bentivoglio, Bologna, Italy
Pediatric Unit, Ospedale di Dolo
🇮🇹Dolo, Venezia, Italy
Pediatric Unit, Ospedale di Ravenna
🇮🇹Ravenna, Italy
Pediatric Unit, Ospedale di Verona
🇮🇹Verona, Italy