SUTURE-CLOSURE OMENTOPEXY VERSUS OMENTOPEXY ALONE IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Early postoperative follow up for repair of perforated peptic ulcer
研究概览
简要总结
The present study will be conducted to assess whether there is a direct benefit associated with modified-Graham's omentopexy (MGO), above and beyond the benefit associated with Graham's omentopexy (GO) in the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. We attempted to answer the question whether primary closure of the perforation in MGO will affect the outcome of surgery. Complication rates will be compared for the two alternative surgical procedures.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •All adult patients of both sexes with a clinical diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer (gastric or duodenal) that are fit to undergo surgery.
排除标准
- •Patients with associated bleeding ulcer (additional steps are needed to control bleeding).
- •Patients with associated pathology other than perforated peptic ulcer that needs surgical intervention.
结局指标
主要结局
Early postoperative follow up for repair of perforated peptic ulcer
时间窗: Three days after the operation
resumption of oral intake
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Adel Ashraf Abdrabou
Resident in the Department of General Surgery, oncological and Laparoscopic Surgery Sohag University Hospital
Sohag University
