MedPath

An Ankle-foot Orthosis Improves Gait Performance and Satisfaction in Stroke Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Gait Analysis
Interventions
Device: 3D printing AFO, anterior AFO, off-the-shelf AFO
Registration Number
NCT03965715
Lead Sponsor
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Brief Summary

All participants were at least 6-month post-stroke and had unilateral limb involvement (8 right/4 left). The main inclusion criteria in selection of the participants in this study were as follows :(1) First stroke (2) At least 6 months post stroke (3) Able to stand for at least one minute without any assistive devices (4) Able to walk for at least 10 meters. All participants were instructed to walk with bare foot or with ankle-foot orthoses(AFOs) separately under gait detection of the motion capture system. Participants were further instructed to complete the 10 Meter Walk Test at a comfortable speed with BF or with AFOs separately. All participants were provided with sufficient rest between each trial. Patient demographics such as lower limb Brunnstrom stage and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score were examined and recorded by experienced therapist. The satisfaction and outcome were measured by the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST) and SF-36. The kinematic and kinetic data were collected by Motion Analysis system.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • First stroke
  • At least 6 months post-stroke
  • Able to stand for at least one minute without any assistive devices
  • Able to walk for at least 10 meters.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Unable to walk for at least 10 meters.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Gait analysis with AFOs3D printing AFO, anterior AFO, off-the-shelf AFOParticipants walk with AFOs under gait detection.
Satisfaction questionnaire3D printing AFO, anterior AFO, off-the-shelf AFOUser feedback from the participants was obtained by questionnaire, the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST) and SF-36, to compare the satisfaction of AFOs
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)one month after intervention

The eight-section questionnaire including vitality,physical functioning,bodily pain,general health perceptions, physical role functioning,emotional role functioning,social role functioning,mental health were surveyed to evaluate participant's quality of life

Kinematic analysisBaseline

A total of 22 reflective markers were attached to the anatomical landmarks of participants, and a motion capture system with eight cameras was used to collect the kinematics data.

10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)Baseline

Each participant preformed three 10MWT trials under each condition, for a total of 9 trials, on the same day with sufficient time given to rest in between trials.

Numerical rating scaleBaseline

Participant fatigue before and after the 10MWT for the 3 experimental conditions was measured via a 5-point numerical rating scale (NRS), with 1 indicating no fatigue and 5 indicating strong fatigue.

The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST)Baseline

The 8 items of the questionnaire included Dimensions, Weight, Ease in Adjusting, Safety and Security, Durability , Ease of Use, Comfortable, and Effectiveness. Each item employed a 5-point scale, with 1-point representing not satisfied at all, and 5-point representing very satisfied.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

National Cheng-Kung University

🇨🇳

Tainan, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath