MedPath

Fibromyalgia: Interventions for Pain and Mood Regulation

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Fibromyalgia
Interventions
Behavioral: Cognitive-behavioral
Behavioral: Mindfulness-acceptance
Other: Pain Education
Registration Number
NCT02683278
Lead Sponsor
Arizona State University
Brief Summary

This study compares the impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy for pain (CBT-P), mindful awareness and acceptance treatment (M), and arthritis education as an active control condition (E) on mental and physical health outcomes among adults with chronic pain due to fibromyalgia (FM).

Detailed Description

Both cognitive-behavioral and mindful-acceptance based treatments impact pain and disability in people with chronic pain conditions like fibromyalgia. However, these treatments target different mechanisms. The focus of CBT is on helping individuals manage their thoughts and behaviors related to pain. In contrast, the focus of M is on improving individuals' ability be aware of and accept their experiences, and to develop their positive emotional resources.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
170
Inclusion Criteria
  • Pain in at least 11 of 18 tenderpoints
  • Able to participate in study assessments and group-based meetings
  • Willing to be randomized to treatment condition
Exclusion Criteria
  • Unable to understand written and spoken English
  • Involved in pain-related litigation
  • Currently involved in psychological treatment for pain and/or mood symptoms

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Cognitive-Behavioral TherapyCognitive-behavioralGroup-based cognitive-behavioral manualized treatment
Mindfulness-acceptance TherapyMindfulness-acceptanceGroup-based mindfulness-acceptance manualized treatment
EducationPain EducationGroup-based manualized pain education
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Bodily PainChange from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup

Assessed via the SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.

Depressive symptomsChange from baseline, 6-mo followup, 12-mo followup

Assessed via the Hamilton Depression Inventory (Reference: Reynolds WM, Kobak KA. Reliability and validity of the Hamilton Depression Inventory: A paper-and-pencil version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Clinical Interview. Psychological Assessment 1995; 7(4): 472-83.

Physical FunctioningChange from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup

Assessed via the SF-36 physical functioning subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36: I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.

VitalityChange from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup

Assessed via the SF-36 Vitality subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.

Social FunctioningChange from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup

Assessed via the SF-36 Social Functioning subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath