Fibromyalgia: Interventions for Pain and Mood Regulation
- Conditions
- Fibromyalgia
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Cognitive-behavioralBehavioral: Mindfulness-acceptanceOther: Pain Education
- Registration Number
- NCT02683278
- Lead Sponsor
- Arizona State University
- Brief Summary
This study compares the impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy for pain (CBT-P), mindful awareness and acceptance treatment (M), and arthritis education as an active control condition (E) on mental and physical health outcomes among adults with chronic pain due to fibromyalgia (FM).
- Detailed Description
Both cognitive-behavioral and mindful-acceptance based treatments impact pain and disability in people with chronic pain conditions like fibromyalgia. However, these treatments target different mechanisms. The focus of CBT is on helping individuals manage their thoughts and behaviors related to pain. In contrast, the focus of M is on improving individuals' ability be aware of and accept their experiences, and to develop their positive emotional resources.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 170
- Pain in at least 11 of 18 tenderpoints
- Able to participate in study assessments and group-based meetings
- Willing to be randomized to treatment condition
- Unable to understand written and spoken English
- Involved in pain-related litigation
- Currently involved in psychological treatment for pain and/or mood symptoms
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Cognitive-behavioral Group-based cognitive-behavioral manualized treatment Mindfulness-acceptance Therapy Mindfulness-acceptance Group-based mindfulness-acceptance manualized treatment Education Pain Education Group-based manualized pain education
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Bodily Pain Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup Assessed via the SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.
Depressive symptoms Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, 12-mo followup Assessed via the Hamilton Depression Inventory (Reference: Reynolds WM, Kobak KA. Reliability and validity of the Hamilton Depression Inventory: A paper-and-pencil version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Clinical Interview. Psychological Assessment 1995; 7(4): 472-83.
Physical Functioning Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup Assessed via the SF-36 physical functioning subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36: I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.
Vitality Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup Assessed via the SF-36 Vitality subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.
Social Functioning Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup Assessed via the SF-36 Social Functioning subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method