MedPath

Incidence of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK) in Long Posterior Spinal Fusion: A Study Comparing Traditional Open Surgery to Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Technique at the Proximal Fusion Levels

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Scoliosis
Kyphosis
Interventions
Procedure: Traditional technique
Procedure: Minimally invasive technique
Registration Number
NCT00890227
Lead Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Brief Summary

This research is being done to compare two methods of surgery to treat scoliosis and/or kyphosis of the spine.

Detailed Description

Currently, there are two different surgical methods used in the treatment of these problems. One method includes an all open posterior spinal fusion (large incision with opening of the muscles); this is also known as a traditional technique. The second method involves an open surgery for the portion of the spine requiring a fusion except the very top area, where minimally invasive technique (smaller incision and without opening of the muscles) is used.

One possible side effect of either method for surgical repair is a condition called proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). PJK occurs in the form of fracture at the top vertebra involved in the surgery or as a loss of correction of spinal alignment achieved, through gradual bending forward of the spine over time. In this study we want to compare the rate of PJK between two groups of patients undergoing long posterior spinal instrumentation fusion.

People undergoing long posterior spinal instrumented fusion may join.

About 68 people will join.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
48
Inclusion Criteria
  • Individuals presenting for surgical correction of scoliosis and/or kyphosis of the thoracolumbar spine are the primary target for enrollment.
  • Men and women ages 18 years or older will be eligible for participation in the current study.
  • In addition, individuals must be able to provide informed consent (Mini-Mental State Examination score of at least 18/30).
Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Traditional techniqueTraditional techniqueAll level open instrumented posterior spinal fusions
Minimally invasive techniqueMinimally invasive techniqueOpen surgery for all the levels except the proximal segment (most proximal instrumented level) where minimally invasive technique will be used.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To estimate the rate of proximal junctional fracture or instrumentation failure leading to kyphosis and loss of correction between two groups.12 months

rate of proximal junctional fracture or instrumentation failure

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To evaluate complication rate between the two groups.3 months

rate of complications

To compare the total operative time between the two groups of surgical patients (as stratified above).12 months

operative time

To compare the length of hospital stay between the two groups of surgical patients (as stratified above).12 months

length of hospital stay

To compare the total recovery time between the two groups of surgical patients (as stratified above).12 months

total recovery time

To assess change in self-reported pain following surgery between two groups of surgical patients (as stratified above).12 months

pain rating

To assess change in self-reported functional limitations following surgery between two groups of surgical patients (as stratified above).12 months

oswestry disability index

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center

🇺🇸

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath