Incidence of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK) in Long Posterior Spinal Fusion: A Study Comparing Traditional Open Surgery to Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Technique at the Proximal Fusion Levels
- Conditions
- ScoliosisKyphosis
- Interventions
- Procedure: Traditional techniqueProcedure: Minimally invasive technique
- Registration Number
- NCT00890227
- Lead Sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Brief Summary
This research is being done to compare two methods of surgery to treat scoliosis and/or kyphosis of the spine.
- Detailed Description
Currently, there are two different surgical methods used in the treatment of these problems. One method includes an all open posterior spinal fusion (large incision with opening of the muscles); this is also known as a traditional technique. The second method involves an open surgery for the portion of the spine requiring a fusion except the very top area, where minimally invasive technique (smaller incision and without opening of the muscles) is used.
One possible side effect of either method for surgical repair is a condition called proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). PJK occurs in the form of fracture at the top vertebra involved in the surgery or as a loss of correction of spinal alignment achieved, through gradual bending forward of the spine over time. In this study we want to compare the rate of PJK between two groups of patients undergoing long posterior spinal instrumentation fusion.
People undergoing long posterior spinal instrumented fusion may join.
About 68 people will join.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 48
- Individuals presenting for surgical correction of scoliosis and/or kyphosis of the thoracolumbar spine are the primary target for enrollment.
- Men and women ages 18 years or older will be eligible for participation in the current study.
- In addition, individuals must be able to provide informed consent (Mini-Mental State Examination score of at least 18/30).
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Traditional technique Traditional technique All level open instrumented posterior spinal fusions Minimally invasive technique Minimally invasive technique Open surgery for all the levels except the proximal segment (most proximal instrumented level) where minimally invasive technique will be used.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To estimate the rate of proximal junctional fracture or instrumentation failure leading to kyphosis and loss of correction between two groups. 12 months rate of proximal junctional fracture or instrumentation failure
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To evaluate complication rate between the two groups. 3 months rate of complications
To compare the total operative time between the two groups of surgical patients (as stratified above). 12 months operative time
To compare the length of hospital stay between the two groups of surgical patients (as stratified above). 12 months length of hospital stay
To compare the total recovery time between the two groups of surgical patients (as stratified above). 12 months total recovery time
To assess change in self-reported pain following surgery between two groups of surgical patients (as stratified above). 12 months pain rating
To assess change in self-reported functional limitations following surgery between two groups of surgical patients (as stratified above). 12 months oswestry disability index
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center
🇺🇸Baltimore, Maryland, United States