Clinical Evaluation of Direct Composite Veneer Restorations Performed in Permanent Incisors Affected by Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Sponsor
- Hacettepe University
- Enrollment
- 100
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- 2.Change from baseline to 12 months regarding "Marginal adaptation"
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The objective of this research was to evaluate the clinical success of direct composite veneer restorations performed in permanent incisors affected by molar-incisor hypomineralization.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Na
- Intervention Model
- Single Group
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 8 Years to 14 Years (Child)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Cooperative children diagnosed with MIH according to European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) criteria
- •Maxillary anterior teeth with MIH-caused coloring and opacity areas
- •Fully erupted anterior teeth
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients and parents of patients who accept to participate.
- •Patients who are not in cooperation with the procedure.
Arms & Interventions
Direct Composite Veneer
This is a single-arm study. Direct composite veneer restoration will be performed to all patients.
Intervention: Composite Veneer Restoration (Other)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
2.Change from baseline to 12 months regarding "Marginal adaptation"
Time Frame: baseline, 3-month, 6-month,12-month
alpha: Explorer does not catch or has one-way catch when drawn across the restoration/tooth interface bravo: explorer falls into crevice drawn across the restoration/tooth interface charlie: Dentin or base is exposed along the margin
3.Change from baseline to 12 months regarding "Surface roughness"
Time Frame: baseline, 3-month, 6-month,12-month
alpha: the surface of the restoration does not have any surface defects bravo: the surface of the restoration has minimal surface defects charlie: the surface of the restoration has severe surface defects
5.Change from baseline to 12 months regarding "Retention"
Time Frame: baseline, 3-month, 6-month,12-month
alpha: intact bravo: chipped/loss of material charlie: complete loss of crown
6.Change from baseline to 12 months regarding "Incisal wear"
Time Frame: baseline, 3-month, 6-month,12-month
alpha: intact bravo: wear of occlusal surface without tooth surface exposure charlie: wear of occlusal surface with tooth surface exposure
1.Change from baseline to 12 months regarding "Anatomic form"
Time Frame: baseline, 3-month, 6-month,12-month
alpha: The general contour of the restorations follows the contour bravo: the general contour of the restoration does not follow the contour of the tooth charlie: The restoration has an overhang does
4.Change from baseline to 12 months regarding "Marginal staining"
Time Frame: baseline, 3-month, 6-month,12-month
alpha: there is no discoloration between the restorations and tooth bravo: there is discoloration on less than half of the circumferential margin charlie: there is discoloration on more than half of the circumferential margin
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Beste Ozgur
Assistant professor
Hacettepe University