Impact of different unconditional monetary incentives on survey response rates in men with prostate cancer: a 2-arm SWAT
- Conditions
- prostate cancerCancer - Prostate
- Registration Number
- ACTRN12622000556741
- Lead Sponsor
- Megan McIntosh
- Brief Summary
Overall, 113 (47%) responded; n=61/121 (50.4%) in the AUD$10 group, and n=52/117 (44.4%) in the AUD$20 group. No difference was found in response rates by incentive group (odds ratio 1.27, 95% CI=0.76-2.12, p=0.36). Additionally, there were no differences in the demographics of the responders vs. non-responders within each incentive group (all p>0.05).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Stopped early
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 238
As in the main trial, participants must have met the following eligibility criteria:
Age 18+ years old, had been diagnosed with prostate cancer between January 2014 and October 2019, were able to communicate in English, and had been on active surveillance for at least six months immediately following their prostate cancer diagnosis.
NA
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The primary outcome of the SWAT was the proportion of responders. Responders were defined as those who either (a) completed and returned a survey (i.e., participants) or (b) did not complete and return the survey but did complete and return a form that had been included with the survey on which individuals could indicate their ineligibility for the study due to having never been on active surveillance (Never on Active Surveillance” form). Packages returned to sender and returned blank questionnaires were not counted as responses.[at 1 month after mail-out of study materials. ]
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The secondary outcome of the SWAT was differences in demographic variables in responders within each incentive group. This self-reported information was sourced from the completed surveys (marital status, employment status, and education level) and the registry (postcode, diagnosis information, and age).[In analysis (response cut off 1 month after study material mail-out). ]